Political Financing and Vulnerability: Social Protection and Election Campaign Financing in Nigeria

Abstract Existing studies have identified five major sources of illegal political financing: namely, funding from questionable sources, corporate bodies, foreign donations, government contractors, and anonymous sources. However, the clientelist manipulation of certain social protection programmes for electoral gains has received scant attention in existing academic conversations on political financing. Hence, this study shows how some social investment programmes in Nigeria, such as the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme, N-Power, TraderMoni, and Micro Enterprise Enhancement Scheme, were exploited by incumbent politicians and their political parties for election campaign financing. The study interrogates how these social protection interventions were manipulated to fertilise the ground for vote solicitation in the build-up to elections in Nigeria. The study relies on documentary evidence, including official documents and media reports. Analysing the data through the theoretical lens of clientelism, the study concludes that politicians and their political patrons frequently exploit social protection interventions to advance their (re)election bids and sustain their patronage networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-025-01074-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Financing and Vulnerability: Social Protection and Election Campaign Financing in Nigeria

Chikodiri Nwangwu
1 citations
Society
International Development and Aid
3.45
article

Political Financing and Vulnerability: Social Protection and Election Campaign Financing in Nigeria

Chikodiri Nwangwu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Existing studies have identified five major sources of illegal political financing: namely, funding from questionable sources, corporate bodies, foreign donations, government contractors, and anonymous sources. However, the clientelist manipulation of certain social protection programmes for electoral gains has received scant attention in existing academic conversations on political financing. Hence, this study shows how some social investment programmes in Nigeria, such as the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme, N-Power, TraderMoni, and Micro Enterprise Enhancement Scheme, were exploited by incumbent politicians and their political parties for election campaign financing. The study interrogates how these social protection interventions were manipulated to fertilise the ground for vote solicitation in the build-up to elections in Nigeria. The study relies on documentary evidence, including official documents and media reports. Analysing the data through the theoretical lens of clientelism, the study concludes that politicians and their political patrons frequently exploit social protection interventions to advance their (re)election bids and sustain their patronage networks.

SocietyVol. 62(6)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
University of Johannesburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
International Development and Aid
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Political Financing and Vulnerability: Social Protection and Election Campaign Financing in Nigeria — Chikodiri Nwangwu · Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS