How Does Cloud Emissivity Feedback Affect Present and Future Arctic Warming?

The Arctic is warming at a rate higher than the global average. Notwithstanding the differences between models and observations, particularly those based on clouds, the physical linkage between cloud process representations and Arctic climate projections remains uncertain. Here, we investigated the simulated and observationally estimated relationships between cloud–radiation interactions and Arctic warming using 30 CMIP6 models, satellite retrievals, and reanalysis data. The underestimated cloud liquid fraction in the models yielded insufficient cloud longwave emissivity and underestimated cloud radiative surface warming. In response to future warming, excessive variations in the ice-to-liquid cloud phase would result in an overestimated increase in cloud emissivity. This process enhances cloud radiative surface warming (and thus Arctic warming) until cloud emissivity attains an asymptotic value of one (blackbody). This implies that the feedback process termed “cloud emissivity positive feedback” in this paper is time-dependent. This, in turn, emphasizes the importance of the cloud phase representation that is consistent with observations of the present climate. Our results explain why the wide inter-model spreads in projected future Arctic warming can be attributed to cloud bias. Thus, these provide a better understanding of uncertain factors in atmosphere–ocean–cryosphere interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34133/olar.0089
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Cloud Emissivity Feedback Affect Present and Future Arctic Warming?

Takuro Michibata, Momoka Nakanishi
3 citations
Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Research
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
3.32
article

How Does Cloud Emissivity Feedback Affect Present and Future Arctic Warming?

Takuro Michibata, Momoka Nakanishi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The Arctic is warming at a rate higher than the global average. Notwithstanding the differences between models and observations, particularly those based on clouds, the physical linkage between cloud process representations and Arctic climate projections remains uncertain. Here, we investigated the simulated and observationally estimated relationships between cloud–radiation interactions and Arctic warming using 30 CMIP6 models, satellite retrievals, and reanalysis data. The underestimated cloud liquid fraction in the models yielded insufficient cloud longwave emissivity and underestimated cloud radiative surface warming. In response to future warming, excessive variations in the ice-to-liquid cloud phase would result in an overestimated increase in cloud emissivity. This process enhances cloud radiative surface warming (and thus Arctic warming) until cloud emissivity attains an asymptotic value of one (blackbody). This implies that the feedback process termed “cloud emissivity positive feedback” in this paper is time-dependent. This, in turn, emphasizes the importance of the cloud phase representation that is consistent with observations of the present climate. Our results explain why the wide inter-model spreads in projected future Arctic warming can be attributed to cloud bias. Thus, these provide a better understanding of uncertain factors in atmosphere–ocean–cryosphere interactions.

Ocean-Land-Atmosphere ResearchVol. 4
Okayama University of Science (JP), Okayama University (JP), Japan Research Institute (JP)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.