The impact of propranolol on the predictive validity of estimated VO2 max by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test: a double-blind crossover study

Abstract Purpose Usage of beta-blockers may influence heart rate response during exercise testing. The study aimed to investigate the impact of Propranolol, a non-selective beta-blocker, on the predictive validity of a commonly used submaximal cycle test, the Ekblom-Bak test (EB-test), for the estimation of maximal oxygen uptake ( V O 2 max). Methods The study was a double-blinded crossover study including 28 participants (14 women), aged 21–59 years. V O 2 max was estimated by the EB-test and measured during a maximal incremental exercise test during placebo and 10 mg Propranolol beta-blockade condition. The EB-test estimates V O 2 max based on the difference in heart rate, ΔHR, between two work rates (4 min cycling on each), a factor corresponding to the higher rate, heart rate at the lower rate, and age. Results Maximal heart rate (mean ± SD; 165.5 ± 16.5 vs. 181.4 ± 9.8 bpm), ΔHR (36.4 ± 13.2 vs. 43.0 ± 11.4 bpm), and measured V O 2 max (48.2 ± 6.2 vs. 50.4 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min, 3.55 ± 0.74 vs. 3.67 ± 0.71 L/min) were significantly lower in the beta-blockade condition compared to placebo ( P = < .001). This led to an overestimation of V O 2 max by the EB-test during beta-blockade, + 0.377 L/min (95% CI 0.281–0.473 L/min, + 11.2%), with no overestimation seen in the placebo condition, + 0.030 L/min (95% CI (− 0.112)–0.172 L/min + 0.8%). The coefficient of variance, indicating variance of estimated V O 2 max on an individual level, was lower during beta-block condition, 6.6%, compared to placebo, 9.9%. Conclusion The EB-test systematically overestimated V O 2 max compared to measured V O 2 max during beta-blockade condition. Future research is needed to refine the test equation for usage in populations using beta-blockers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Sciences for Health
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-025-01396-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of propranolol on the predictive validity of estimated VO2 max by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test: a double-blind crossover study

Elin Ekblom‐Bak, Torbjörn Helge, Simon Östh
1 citations
Sport Sciences for Health
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
2.01
article

The impact of propranolol on the predictive validity of estimated VO2 max by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test: a double-blind crossover study

Elin Ekblom‐Bak, Torbjörn Helge, Simon Östh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Usage of beta-blockers may influence heart rate response during exercise testing. The study aimed to investigate the impact of Propranolol, a non-selective beta-blocker, on the predictive validity of a commonly used submaximal cycle test, the Ekblom-Bak test (EB-test), for the estimation of maximal oxygen uptake ( V O 2 max). Methods The study was a double-blinded crossover study including 28 participants (14 women), aged 21–59 years. V O 2 max was estimated by the EB-test and measured during a maximal incremental exercise test during placebo and 10 mg Propranolol beta-blockade condition. The EB-test estimates V O 2 max based on the difference in heart rate, ΔHR, between two work rates (4 min cycling on each), a factor corresponding to the higher rate, heart rate at the lower rate, and age. Results Maximal heart rate (mean ± SD; 165.5 ± 16.5 vs. 181.4 ± 9.8 bpm), ΔHR (36.4 ± 13.2 vs. 43.0 ± 11.4 bpm), and measured V O 2 max (48.2 ± 6.2 vs. 50.4 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min, 3.55 ± 0.74 vs. 3.67 ± 0.71 L/min) were significantly lower in the beta-blockade condition compared to placebo ( P = < .001). This led to an overestimation of V O 2 max by the EB-test during beta-blockade, + 0.377 L/min (95% CI 0.281–0.473 L/min, + 11.2%), with no overestimation seen in the placebo condition, + 0.030 L/min (95% CI (− 0.112)–0.172 L/min + 0.8%). The coefficient of variance, indicating variance of estimated V O 2 max on an individual level, was lower during beta-block condition, 6.6%, compared to placebo, 9.9%. Conclusion The EB-test systematically overestimated V O 2 max compared to measured V O 2 max during beta-blockade condition. Future research is needed to refine the test equation for usage in populations using beta-blockers.

Sport Sciences for HealthVol. 21(3)
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of propranolol on the predictive validity of estimated VO2 max by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test: a double-blind crossover study — Elin Ekblom‐Bak, Torbjörn Helge, et al. · Sport Sciences for Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS