Gendering Chronic Illness in Patient Advocacy

Investigating the association of gender to medical conditions and its implications for healthcare research and practices has become a notable trend in social scientific literature on medicine and health. While gender biases in medical research are well-documented, less attention has been paid to how patient advocacy groups engage with gendered narratives associated with chronic illnesses. This study examines how Finnish patient organisations advocating for endometriosis, migraine, and fibromyalgia navigate genderedness and engage in gendering – at times reinscribing genderedness for inclusion, at others emphasising it for legitimacy, or distancing from genderedness to avoid stigma. We do this through a thematic analysis of the patient organisations’ websites and social media presence, and interviews with their representatives, using the conceptual framework of haunting. We show that there is no simple way to interpret and mobilise associations between gender and medical conditions, and that their approach to gendering is shaped by considerations of history, strategy, and aims of advocacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Feminist Studies
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2025.2488425
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gendering Chronic Illness in Patient Advocacy

Ahalya Ganesh, Maria Temmes, Lilli Aini Rokkonen
1 citations
Australian Feminist Studies
Obesity and Health Practices
2.02
article

Gendering Chronic Illness in Patient Advocacy

Ahalya Ganesh, Maria Temmes, Lilli Aini Rokkonen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Investigating the association of gender to medical conditions and its implications for healthcare research and practices has become a notable trend in social scientific literature on medicine and health. While gender biases in medical research are well-documented, less attention has been paid to how patient advocacy groups engage with gendered narratives associated with chronic illnesses. This study examines how Finnish patient organisations advocating for endometriosis, migraine, and fibromyalgia navigate genderedness and engage in gendering – at times reinscribing genderedness for inclusion, at others emphasising it for legitimacy, or distancing from genderedness to avoid stigma. We do this through a thematic analysis of the patient organisations’ websites and social media presence, and interviews with their representatives, using the conceptual framework of haunting. We show that there is no simple way to interpret and mobilise associations between gender and medical conditions, and that their approach to gendering is shaped by considerations of history, strategy, and aims of advocacy.

Australian Feminist StudiesVol. 40(124-125)
Tampere University (FI)
Academy of Finland, Koneen Säätiö
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Obesity and Health Practices
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.