Beyond black and white: Reducing dichotomous thinking to foster intellectual humility

• Explored the link between dichotomous thinking and intellectual humility. • Dialectical treatment lowers dichotomous thinking, boosts intellectual humility. • Confirmed causal impact via instrumental variable estimation. • Findings suggest practical methods for increasing intellectual humility. This study examines the causal influence of dichotomous thinking on intellectual humility, evaluated through treatments designed to both increase and decrease dichotomous thinking. Employing an experimental design with 445 participants, we exposed experimental groups to either a black and white thinking treatment (high dichotomous thinking condition) or a dialectical thinking treatment (low dichotomous thinking condition), and then compared their intellectual humility scores to a control group. As hypothesized, significant differences in intellectual humility emerged among the groups. The most substantial effects were observed in the group exposed to the dialectical thinking treatment (low dichotomous thinking condition), where participants exhibited significantly elevated intellectual humility scores. Using instrumental variable estimation for the purposes of causal inference, we also confirmed that the mechanism by which the dialectical thinking treatment increased intellectual humility was by decreasing dichotomous thinking. Our study provides insights into the factors that influence intellectual humility and offers a practical method to enhance it through fostering dialectical thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101841
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond black and white: Reducing dichotomous thinking to foster intellectual humility

Andrew Spark, Peter O’Connor, Jordan Moss, Jessica Chandra et al.
1 citations
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
article

Beyond black and white: Reducing dichotomous thinking to foster intellectual humility

Andrew Spark, Peter O’Connor, Jordan Moss, Jessica Chandra, Yasmin Awan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Explored the link between dichotomous thinking and intellectual humility. • Dialectical treatment lowers dichotomous thinking, boosts intellectual humility. • Confirmed causal impact via instrumental variable estimation. • Findings suggest practical methods for increasing intellectual humility. This study examines the causal influence of dichotomous thinking on intellectual humility, evaluated through treatments designed to both increase and decrease dichotomous thinking. Employing an experimental design with 445 participants, we exposed experimental groups to either a black and white thinking treatment (high dichotomous thinking condition) or a dialectical thinking treatment (low dichotomous thinking condition), and then compared their intellectual humility scores to a control group. As hypothesized, significant differences in intellectual humility emerged among the groups. The most substantial effects were observed in the group exposed to the dialectical thinking treatment (low dichotomous thinking condition), where participants exhibited significantly elevated intellectual humility scores. Using instrumental variable estimation for the purposes of causal inference, we also confirmed that the mechanism by which the dialectical thinking treatment increased intellectual humility was by decreasing dichotomous thinking. Our study provides insights into the factors that influence intellectual humility and offers a practical method to enhance it through fostering dialectical thinking.

Thinking Skills and CreativityVol. 57
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.