Moral Distress, Disempowerment, and Responsibility
Since Andrew Jameton first introduced the concept of moral distress, a growing theoretical literature has attempted to identify its distinctive features. This theoretical work has overlooked a central feature of morally distressing situations: disempowerment. My aim is to correct this neglect by arguing for a new test for theories of moral distress. I call this the disempowerment requirement: a theory of moral distress ought to accommodate the disempowerment of morally distressing situations. I argue for the disempowerment requirement and illustrate how to apply it by showing that recent responsibility-based theories of moral distress fail to pass the test.
Authors
- Matthew Bennett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9482-4091)
Institutions
- University of Essex (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Philosophy of Medicine
- Published
- 2025-04-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2025.210
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in medical practice
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00