A workflow for collecting and understanding stories at scale, supported by artificial intelligence

This article presents an artificial intelligence-assisted causal mapping pipeline for gathering and analysing stakeholder perspectives at scale. Evidence relevant to constructing a programme theory, as well as evidence for the causal influences flowing through it, are both collected at the same time, without the evaluator needing to possess a prior theory. The method uses an artificial intelligence interviewer to conduct interviews, automated coding to identify causal claims in the transcripts, and causal mapping to synthesise and visualise results. The authors tested this approach by interviewing participants about problems facing the United States. Results indicate that the method can efficiently collect and process qualitative data, producing useful causal maps that capture respondents’ views. The article discusses the potential of this approach for evaluation, enabling rapid, large-scale qualitative analysis. It also notes limitations and ethical concerns, emphasising the need for human oversight and verification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890251328640
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A workflow for collecting and understanding stories at scale, supported by artificial intelligence

Steve Powell, Gabriele Caldas Cabral, hannah Mishan
2 citations
Evaluation
Topic Modeling
4.96
article

A workflow for collecting and understanding stories at scale, supported by artificial intelligence

Steve Powell, Gabriele Caldas Cabral, hannah Mishan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article presents an artificial intelligence-assisted causal mapping pipeline for gathering and analysing stakeholder perspectives at scale. Evidence relevant to constructing a programme theory, as well as evidence for the causal influences flowing through it, are both collected at the same time, without the evaluator needing to possess a prior theory. The method uses an artificial intelligence interviewer to conduct interviews, automated coding to identify causal claims in the transcripts, and causal mapping to synthesise and visualise results. The authors tested this approach by interviewing participants about problems facing the United States. Results indicate that the method can efficiently collect and process qualitative data, producing useful causal maps that capture respondents’ views. The article discusses the potential of this approach for evaluation, enabling rapid, large-scale qualitative analysis. It also notes limitations and ethical concerns, emphasising the need for human oversight and verification.

EvaluationVol. 31(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Topic Modeling
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.