Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship

Currently, the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) method is widely recognized as a prevalent approach for computing ship maneuvering forces and moments. Obtaining hydrodynamic derivatives using pure RANS is time-consuming, especially with rotating propellers. A reasonable simplification of the propeller is usually necessary to improve simulation efficiency. The ITTC suggests both the discretized propeller model (DPM) and the body-force model (BFM) for RANS simulations. While BFM offers computational efficiency, it may not accurately represent large-amplitude ship maneuvers. It is quite significant to figure out how BFM affects numerical accuracy. This study compares the DPM and a very simple BFM in RANS simulations of the KCS (KRISO Container Ship), focusing on static rudder, drift, and circle motion tests. The main purpose is to check the differences between the simulated results by using the BFM and DPM. While side forces and yaw moments from both models are similar, discrepancies in longitudinal forces increase with higher rudder angles, drift angles, or turning rates. Errors in side forces and yaw moments are under 10% for both models, compared with experimental data. But BFM’s longitudinal force errors exceed 20% at large motion amplitudes, indicating reduced accuracy compared to DPM. The results of the BFM method are subject to two main sources of error. First, the lack of physical shape representation for the propeller blades leads to the absence of lather force during rotation. This in turn results in an inaccurate prediction of the interaction between the propeller blade root or blade tip leakage vortices and the rudder. Second, the limitations of the adopted model prevent it from accurately providing the thrust and torque generated by the propeller under actual operating conditions.