Germany’s established non-native species: a comprehensive breakdown

Abstract Background The introduction of non-native species can cause significant ecological and economic impacts by disrupting local habitats and ecosystem services. Due to its central European location and extensive trade networks, Germany is particularly susceptible to the introduction and spread of non-native species. Here, we compiled the first comprehensive list of established non-native species in Germany, detailing the invaded environments, native regions, and documented impacts. Results The final list included 1962 established non-native species from 594 families and 35 phyla, with Tracheophyta ( n = 839), Arthropoda ( n = 612), and Chordata ( n = 129) being the most represented. Most of these species were terrestrial (79.3%), followed by semi-aquatic (8.4%), with less than 5% occupying freshwaters and other ecosystems. This study highlights a significant lack of information on the impacts of non-native species in Germany, with 97.9% of species having unknown effects. The greatest number of species included in this list were native to the Palearctic region ( n = 813), followed by the Nearctic ( n = 365) and Neotropic ( n = 127) regions. However, many species were of unknown origin ( n = 335), with a smaller subset classified as widespread ( n = 166). Conclusions This first comprehensive list of established non-native species is essential for guiding management strategies in Germany. By cataloguing established non-native species and their impacts, it provides policymakers and stakeholders with a clearer understanding of which species are present, their patterns of spread, and their potential impacts, enabling them to prioritise management efforts for the most harmful species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sciences Europe
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01094-w
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Germany’s established non-native species: a comprehensive breakdown

Elizabeta Briski, Ismael Soto, Catalina Ríos-Henríquez, Kathrin Theißinger et al.
8 citations
Environmental Sciences Europe
Biological Control of Invasive Species
13.38
article

Germany’s established non-native species: a comprehensive breakdown

Elizabeta Briski, Ismael Soto, Catalina Ríos-Henríquez, Kathrin Theißinger, Carlos Cano‐Barbacil, Phillip Joschka Haubrock, Ben Parker, Guntram Weithoff
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The introduction of non-native species can cause significant ecological and economic impacts by disrupting local habitats and ecosystem services. Due to its central European location and extensive trade networks, Germany is particularly susceptible to the introduction and spread of non-native species. Here, we compiled the first comprehensive list of established non-native species in Germany, detailing the invaded environments, native regions, and documented impacts. Results The final list included 1962 established non-native species from 594 families and 35 phyla, with Tracheophyta ( n = 839), Arthropoda ( n = 612), and Chordata ( n = 129) being the most represented. Most of these species were terrestrial (79.3%), followed by semi-aquatic (8.4%), with less than 5% occupying freshwaters and other ecosystems. This study highlights a significant lack of information on the impacts of non-native species in Germany, with 97.9% of species having unknown effects. The greatest number of species included in this list were native to the Palearctic region ( n = 813), followed by the Nearctic ( n = 365) and Neotropic ( n = 127) regions. However, many species were of unknown origin ( n = 335), with a smaller subset classified as widespread ( n = 166). Conclusions This first comprehensive list of established non-native species is essential for guiding management strategies in Germany. By cataloguing established non-native species and their impacts, it provides policymakers and stakeholders with a clearer understanding of which species are present, their patterns of spread, and their potential impacts, enabling them to prioritise management efforts for the most harmful species.

Environmental Sciences EuropeVol. 37(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Potsdam (DE), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), University of Exeter (GB), University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (DE), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE), University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ), GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE), Ecologie & Evolution (FR), Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (DE), South Bohemia research center of aquaculture and biodiversity of hydrocenoses (CZ), Bournemouth University (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
13.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.