Differentiated (Dis)integration and Deinstitutionalization in the African Security Regime Complex

Abstract Differentiated (dis)integration processes of regional and international organizations seem to have grown over the past years. As a continent in which regional integration efforts and institutions mushroomed in the last decades and created a “spaghetti bowl” of regionalism, Africa is highly relevant for examining and explaining these processes. Against the background of a need to assess and conceptualize (dis)integration beyond Europe, we propose deinstitutionalization to grasp the puzzling bypassing of established institutions for, instead, the emergence of more informalized settings. We analyze two of such processes within the African security regime complex: the Western African response to the Boko Haram uprising in the Lake Chad region and the Southern African response to a coup d’état in Lesotho. Identifying evidence of such processes of deinstitutionalization, we argue that specific internal and external factors constitute drivers for this development. Internally, powerful states and regional hegemons favor domestic narratives and interests over regional ones, whereas externally, international partners create (unintended) incentives for extraversion strategies and disintegration practices in subregions. These dynamics can lead to further deinstitutionalization of the African security complex, such as through ad hoc groups, and eventually disintegrate established paths of African regionalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politische Vierteljahresschrift
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-025-00611-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiated (Dis)integration and Deinstitutionalization in the African Security Regime Complex

Friedrich Plank, Johannes Muntschick
1 citations
Politische Vierteljahresschrift
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
8.52
article

Differentiated (Dis)integration and Deinstitutionalization in the African Security Regime Complex

Friedrich Plank, Johannes Muntschick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Differentiated (dis)integration processes of regional and international organizations seem to have grown over the past years. As a continent in which regional integration efforts and institutions mushroomed in the last decades and created a “spaghetti bowl” of regionalism, Africa is highly relevant for examining and explaining these processes. Against the background of a need to assess and conceptualize (dis)integration beyond Europe, we propose deinstitutionalization to grasp the puzzling bypassing of established institutions for, instead, the emergence of more informalized settings. We analyze two of such processes within the African security regime complex: the Western African response to the Boko Haram uprising in the Lake Chad region and the Southern African response to a coup d’état in Lesotho. Identifying evidence of such processes of deinstitutionalization, we argue that specific internal and external factors constitute drivers for this development. Internally, powerful states and regional hegemons favor domestic narratives and interests over regional ones, whereas externally, international partners create (unintended) incentives for extraversion strategies and disintegration practices in subregions. These dynamics can lead to further deinstitutionalization of the African security complex, such as through ad hoc groups, and eventually disintegrate established paths of African regionalism.

Politische VierteljahresschriftVol. 66(3)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.