Discrepancies of calculated percentage pain reduction versus patient reported percentage perceived reduction in pain intensity after axial spine medial branch block

The CCC ranged from 0.44 to 0.62 between PRPPR and CPPR in patients with chronic axial pain undergoing diagnostic MBB. PRPPR scores showed greater pain relief than CPPR scores, especially over time. Agreement was higher at extremes of pain relief, while partial average pain relief demonstrated less agreement. Clinicians should therefore not assume equivalence between CPPR and PRPPR. More importantly, there is significant variability in how a patient is categorized for MBB success depending on the measure employed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Medicine
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf046
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancies of calculated percentage pain reduction versus patient reported percentage perceived reduction in pain intensity after axial spine medial branch block

Reza Ehsanian, Byron J. Schneider, W. Evan Rivers, Ameet Nagpal et al.
Pain Medicine
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Discrepancies of calculated percentage pain reduction versus patient reported percentage perceived reduction in pain intensity after axial spine medial branch block

Reza Ehsanian, Byron J. Schneider, W. Evan Rivers, Ameet Nagpal, David J. Kennedy, Zachary L. McCormick, Patricia Zheng, Jordan A Buttner, Jaymin M. Patel
article en

Abstract

The CCC ranged from 0.44 to 0.62 between PRPPR and CPPR in patients with chronic axial pain undergoing diagnostic MBB. PRPPR scores showed greater pain relief than CPPR scores, especially over time. Agreement was higher at extremes of pain relief, while partial average pain relief demonstrated less agreement. Clinicians should therefore not assume equivalence between CPPR and PRPPR. More importantly, there is significant variability in how a patient is categorized for MBB success depending on the measure employed.

Pain MedicineVol. 26(9)
Emory University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Utah (US), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discrepancies of calculated percentage pain reduction versus patient reported percentage perceived reduction in pain intensity after axial spine medial branch block — Reza Ehsanian, Byron J. Schneider, et al. · Pain Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS