A Novel Method for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon Density Using Soil Organic Carbon and Gravel Content Data

Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) is crucial for assessing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, but its estimation remains challenging when bulk density (BD) data are unavailable. Traditional methods for substituting missing BD data, including using the mean, median, and pedotransfer functions (PTFs), introduce varying degrees of uncertainty in SOCD estimation: (1) The mean and median methods ignore the effects of soil type, environmental conditions, and land use changes on BD. They also heavily rely on the representativeness of soil samples, which may lead to systematic bias. (2) The accuracy of PTFs depends on modeling approaches, variable selection, and dataset characteristics, and differences among PTFs may introduce estimation biases in SOCD. To overcome this challenge, we analyzed 443 soil profiles from the Yangtze River Delta region of China and developed an innovative approach that estimates SOCD using only SOC and gravel content data. By formulating linear, polynomial, and power function regression models, we directly estimated SOCD per centimeter of soil horizon i (SOCDicm) under conditions with and without available gravel content data, followed by SOCD calculation. The results indicated a strong correlation between SOC and SOCDicm, with the three function models for direct SOC-based SOCDicm estimation yielding consistently high accuracy. Neglecting gravel content overall resulted in the overestimation of SOCDicm by 7.01–9.45%. After incorporating gravel content as a correction factor, the accuracy of the new method for estimating SOCD was improved, with the prediction set achieving R² values of 0.927–0.945, an RMSE of 0.819–0.949 kg m−2, and an RPIQ of 4.773–5.533. The accuracy of estimating SOCD surpassed that of the BD mean and median methods and was comparable to that of the PTF method, thus enabling reliable SOCD estimation. This study introduces an innovative approach by developing regional models to estimate SOCDicm, enabling rapid SOCD estimation for samples with missing BD information in historical data, and provides a new methodology for calculating regional and global SOC stocks. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of soil carbon stock estimation, supporting land management and carbon cycle research, and providing scientific evidence for sustainable agricultural development and climate change mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083533
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Method for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon Density Using Soil Organic Carbon and Gravel Content Data

Caixia Jiao, Guanghui Zheng, Rong Zeng, Chengyi Zhao et al.
1 citations
Sustainability
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
article

A Novel Method for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon Density Using Soil Organic Carbon and Gravel Content Data

Caixia Jiao, Guanghui Zheng, Rong Zeng, Chengyi Zhao, Mingxing Xu, Yan Wang, Jiawen Fan, Yujie Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) is crucial for assessing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, but its estimation remains challenging when bulk density (BD) data are unavailable. Traditional methods for substituting missing BD data, including using the mean, median, and pedotransfer functions (PTFs), introduce varying degrees of uncertainty in SOCD estimation: (1) The mean and median methods ignore the effects of soil type, environmental conditions, and land use changes on BD. They also heavily rely on the representativeness of soil samples, which may lead to systematic bias. (2) The accuracy of PTFs depends on modeling approaches, variable selection, and dataset characteristics, and differences among PTFs may introduce estimation biases in SOCD. To overcome this challenge, we analyzed 443 soil profiles from the Yangtze River Delta region of China and developed an innovative approach that estimates SOCD using only SOC and gravel content data. By formulating linear, polynomial, and power function regression models, we directly estimated SOCD per centimeter of soil horizon i (SOCDicm) under conditions with and without available gravel content data, followed by SOCD calculation. The results indicated a strong correlation between SOC and SOCDicm, with the three function models for direct SOC-based SOCDicm estimation yielding consistently high accuracy. Neglecting gravel content overall resulted in the overestimation of SOCDicm by 7.01–9.45%. After incorporating gravel content as a correction factor, the accuracy of the new method for estimating SOCD was improved, with the prediction set achieving R² values of 0.927–0.945, an RMSE of 0.819–0.949 kg m−2, and an RPIQ of 4.773–5.533. The accuracy of estimating SOCD surpassed that of the BD mean and median methods and was comparable to that of the PTF method, thus enabling reliable SOCD estimation. This study introduces an innovative approach by developing regional models to estimate SOCDicm, enabling rapid SOCD estimation for samples with missing BD information in historical data, and provides a new methodology for calculating regional and global SOC stocks. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of soil carbon stock estimation, supporting land management and carbon cycle research, and providing scientific evidence for sustainable agricultural development and climate change mitigation strategies.

SustainabilityVol. 17(8)
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.