How Women and Men Should (Not) Be: Gender Rules and Their Alignment With Status Beliefs Across Nations

Gender rules, that is, prescriptive and proscriptive gender stereotypes, dictate how women and men should and should not be, and thereby perpetuate the gender hierarchy that privileges men over women. Across seven nations that span the continuum of gender equality, we investigated gender status norms by identifying the extent to which gender rules correspond with social status beliefs. As expected, in all investigated nations, participants ( N = 4,327) believed that men should not show low-status traits reflecting weakness (e.g., weak, naive) but should show high-status traits reflecting agency (e.g., leadership ability, ambitious). Correlational analyses found that the more gender-equal a nation, the more men's agency prescriptions were aligned with high-status and their weakness proscriptions with low-status characteristics. Moreover, participants believed that women should not show high-status traits reflecting dominance (e.g., dominant, demanding) in the United States, Turkey, India, and Ghana—that is, in the relatively less gender-equal nations. Yet, no trait was proscribed for women in the relatively more gender-equal nations of Switzerland and Sweden. The status alignment of women's prescriptions and proscriptions did not relate to nations’ achieved gender equality. We discuss how the alignment of men's gender rules with status beliefs represents a hidden barrier to achieving full gender equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843251328263
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Women and Men Should (Not) Be: Gender Rules and Their Alignment With Status Beliefs Across Nations

Sabine Sczesny, Christa Nater, Nuray Sakallı-Uğurlu, Laurie A. Rudman et al.
8 citations
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Gender Politics and Representation
30.94
article

How Women and Men Should (Not) Be: Gender Rules and Their Alignment With Status Beliefs Across Nations

Sabine Sczesny, Christa Nater, Nuray Sakallı-Uğurlu, Laurie A. Rudman, Akanksha Lohmore, Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Shera Malayeri, Franziska Magdalena Saxler
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Gender rules, that is, prescriptive and proscriptive gender stereotypes, dictate how women and men should and should not be, and thereby perpetuate the gender hierarchy that privileges men over women. Across seven nations that span the continuum of gender equality, we investigated gender status norms by identifying the extent to which gender rules correspond with social status beliefs. As expected, in all investigated nations, participants ( N = 4,327) believed that men should not show low-status traits reflecting weakness (e.g., weak, naive) but should show high-status traits reflecting agency (e.g., leadership ability, ambitious). Correlational analyses found that the more gender-equal a nation, the more men's agency prescriptions were aligned with high-status and their weakness proscriptions with low-status characteristics. Moreover, participants believed that women should not show high-status traits reflecting dominance (e.g., dominant, demanding) in the United States, Turkey, India, and Ghana—that is, in the relatively less gender-equal nations. Yet, no trait was proscribed for women in the relatively more gender-equal nations of Switzerland and Sweden. The status alignment of women's prescriptions and proscriptions did not relate to nations’ achieved gender equality. We discuss how the alignment of men's gender rules with status beliefs represents a hidden barrier to achieving full gender equality.

Psychology of Women QuarterlyVol. 49(2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Bern (CH), Stockholm University (SE), Middle East Technical University (TR), Technological University Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Gender Politics and Representation
30.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.