Politics for Survival: Ideological Control and Corporate Strategic Behavior

Ideological control is widely adopted in authoritarian regimes and is often seen as a top-down process. This article advances an alternative view that focuses on its bottom-up part, where firms not only comply with state power but also utilize the control to advance their interests. We substantiate this claim by studying how firms reacted to the policy shift in China during 2017–2018. Using an original firm-year-level panel data set and difference-in-differences as causal identification, we show that Chinese firms engage in party-building activities in the face of rising ideological control, with large firms showing more prominent response than small firms. We conduct further mechanism analysis to show their incentives: firms exhibit political loyalty as a means of self-preservation, but they also leverage such control measures to serve their interests. These findings elucidate the bilateral interactions between firms and the state in durable authoritarian regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251331429
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politics for Survival: Ideological Control and Corporate Strategic Behavior

Wenyi Lu, Siyuan Fan, Weijie Chen
Political Studies
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Politics for Survival: Ideological Control and Corporate Strategic Behavior

Wenyi Lu, Siyuan Fan, Weijie Chen
article en

Abstract

Ideological control is widely adopted in authoritarian regimes and is often seen as a top-down process. This article advances an alternative view that focuses on its bottom-up part, where firms not only comply with state power but also utilize the control to advance their interests. We substantiate this claim by studying how firms reacted to the policy shift in China during 2017–2018. Using an original firm-year-level panel data set and difference-in-differences as causal identification, we show that Chinese firms engage in party-building activities in the face of rising ideological control, with large firms showing more prominent response than small firms. We conduct further mechanism analysis to show their incentives: firms exhibit political loyalty as a means of self-preservation, but they also leverage such control measures to serve their interests. These findings elucidate the bilateral interactions between firms and the state in durable authoritarian regimes.

Political Studies
Peking University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.