Modern German historiography of the Comintern

Aim. To analyse the assessments of the Comintern policy by German historians at the present stage (since the early 1990s). Methodology. Publications devoted to the activities of the Comintern that fit the specified criteria were studied, several groups of researchers were formed depending on their assessments: the opinions are arranged in accordance with the internal logic of the article. Results. The analysis showed that the majority of German historians believe that the Comintern actively interfered in the internal affairs of the German Communist Party: this was manifested during the events of March 1921 and October 1923, as well as during the implementation of the “class against class” tactics. On the other hand, a number of researchers come to the conclusion that the ultra-left policy of the GCP was initiated “from below”; during the years of implementing the “class against class” tactics, the GCP took a number of measures without coordinating them with the Comintern. Research implications. For the first time, the research material on this topic has been summarized. The problems of studying the relationship of the Comintern with the communist parties (mainly the Communist Party of Germany) have been updated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the State University of Education Series History and Political Sciences
Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2024-4-117-126
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern German historiography of the Comintern

A. I. Suzdaltsev
Bulletin of the State University of Education Series History and Political Sciences
Race, History, and American Society
article

Modern German historiography of the Comintern

A. I. Suzdaltsev
article en

Abstract

Aim. To analyse the assessments of the Comintern policy by German historians at the present stage (since the early 1990s). Methodology. Publications devoted to the activities of the Comintern that fit the specified criteria were studied, several groups of researchers were formed depending on their assessments: the opinions are arranged in accordance with the internal logic of the article. Results. The analysis showed that the majority of German historians believe that the Comintern actively interfered in the internal affairs of the German Communist Party: this was manifested during the events of March 1921 and October 1923, as well as during the implementation of the “class against class” tactics. On the other hand, a number of researchers come to the conclusion that the ultra-left policy of the GCP was initiated “from below”; during the years of implementing the “class against class” tactics, the GCP took a number of measures without coordinating them with the Comintern. Research implications. For the first time, the research material on this topic has been summarized. The problems of studying the relationship of the Comintern with the communist parties (mainly the Communist Party of Germany) have been updated.

Bulletin of the State University of Education Series History and Political Sciences(4)
Moscow State Open University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modern German historiography of the Comintern — A. I. Suzdaltsev · Bulletin of the State University of Education Series History and Political Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS