Immune Profiling of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases and Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors

Responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) differ significantly between uveal melanoma (UM) and cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients. We investigated the immune profile of metastatic UM(mUM) patients and identified markers that are predictive of improved survival. Metastatic liver samples from 189 UM patients and 48 CM patients were analyzed at genomic and transcriptional levels, and survival analysis was performed on a subgroup of 76 ICI-treated mUM patients. UM liver metastases seem to preserve the genomic and immune characteristics of primary UM (pUM), with a low prevalence of ICI markers and high mutation rates of GNA11, GNAQ, BAP1, and SF3B. Compared with mCM, UM liver metastasis showed lower infiltration of several immune cells, but a greater proportion of M2 macrophages. Compared with UM liver metastases, CM liver metastases showed higher expression of G2M checkpoint and EF2 target genes. Among the mUM and mCM samples, expression of G2M and E2F pathway genes was highest in tumors with high TMB values and T-cell inflamed scores. A longer median overall survival (OS) was observed in mUM patients with higher expression of LAG3, HLA class I, or HLA class II; which may represent a small proportion of immune hot tumors. Expression patterns of G2M checkpoint and E2F targets suggest a possible contribution to immunotherapy response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Immunotherapy
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cji.0000000000000558
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immune Profiling of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases and Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors

Andrew Hinton, Ari M. Vanderwalde, Soo J. Park, Takami Sato et al.
1 citations
Journal of Immunotherapy
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
1.71
article

Immune Profiling of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases and Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors

Andrew Hinton, Ari M. Vanderwalde, Soo J. Park, Takami Sato, Yusra F. Shao, Sourat Darabi, Matthew J. Hadfield, Yasmine Baca, Joanne Xiu, Justin C. Moser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) differ significantly between uveal melanoma (UM) and cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients. We investigated the immune profile of metastatic UM(mUM) patients and identified markers that are predictive of improved survival. Metastatic liver samples from 189 UM patients and 48 CM patients were analyzed at genomic and transcriptional levels, and survival analysis was performed on a subgroup of 76 ICI-treated mUM patients. UM liver metastases seem to preserve the genomic and immune characteristics of primary UM (pUM), with a low prevalence of ICI markers and high mutation rates of GNA11, GNAQ, BAP1, and SF3B. Compared with mCM, UM liver metastasis showed lower infiltration of several immune cells, but a greater proportion of M2 macrophages. Compared with UM liver metastases, CM liver metastases showed higher expression of G2M checkpoint and EF2 target genes. Among the mUM and mCM samples, expression of G2M and E2F pathway genes was highest in tumors with high TMB values and T-cell inflamed scores. A longer median overall survival (OS) was observed in mUM patients with higher expression of LAG3, HLA class I, or HLA class II; which may represent a small proportion of immune hot tumors. Expression patterns of G2M checkpoint and E2F targets suggest a possible contribution to immunotherapy response.

Journal of ImmunotherapyVol. 48(5)
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Wayne State University (US), Brown University (US), University of California San Diego (US), The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), HonorHealth (US), Caris Life Sciences (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.