Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Fixed and Mobile Primary Eye Health Services
Mobile approaches are substantially more cost-effective at case finding, due to the increased utilization of resources made possible by a mobile operating model. When considering both case finding and downstream treatment costs, community and health outpost screening dominate other strategies. The results point to the need for careful analysis of costs and outcomes along the entire continuum-of-care to appropriately inform planners of primary eye health networks in low-and-middle-income countries.
Authors
- Brad Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8704-6225)
- Heidi Chase
- Bryce Everett
- Heidy Linares
- Ana Velasquez Marroquin
- Juan Francisco Yee
Institutions
- Seva Foundation (US)
- Metta Development Foundation (MM)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ophthalmic Epidemiology
- Published
- 2025-04-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2488892
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.35
Funders
- Seva Foundation