Re-evaluating adjuvant systemic therapy in cancer treatment: Scientific rigour to guide policy and practice

The landscape of adjuvant treatment in cancer care is rapidly changing. Recent randomised trials have led to regulatory approvals for neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal agents, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This has brought about increasing complexity in this space, challenging previously established paradigms of adjuvant treatment. As these treatments are increasingly implemented, healthcare systesms around the world face the challenge of critically appraising these studies and determining whether the treatments proposed provide clinically meaningful benefit. This article considers the validity of these data in the context of fundamental principles of adjuvant therapy, as well as the scientific rigour of the relevant registration trials. We propose a greater role for practising oncologists in the regulatory and reimbursement process, using the Singaporean context as an example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024305
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-evaluating adjuvant systemic therapy in cancer treatment: Scientific rigour to guide policy and practice

Daniel Jia Ming Ang, Mohamad Farid
Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Re-evaluating adjuvant systemic therapy in cancer treatment: Scientific rigour to guide policy and practice

Daniel Jia Ming Ang, Mohamad Farid
article en

Abstract

The landscape of adjuvant treatment in cancer care is rapidly changing. Recent randomised trials have led to regulatory approvals for neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal agents, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This has brought about increasing complexity in this space, challenging previously established paradigms of adjuvant treatment. As these treatments are increasingly implemented, healthcare systesms around the world face the challenge of critically appraising these studies and determining whether the treatments proposed provide clinically meaningful benefit. This article considers the validity of these data in the context of fundamental principles of adjuvant therapy, as well as the scientific rigour of the relevant registration trials. We propose a greater role for practising oncologists in the regulatory and reimbursement process, using the Singaporean context as an example.

Annals of the Academy of Medicine SingaporeVol. 54(4)
National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Re-evaluating adjuvant systemic therapy in cancer treatment: Scientific rigour to guide policy and practice — Daniel Jia Ming Ang, Mohamad Farid · Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS