The Red Sea Conflict and Market Reactions: Examining the Role of Military Strength in Financial Markets

Abstract This study examines market reactions to the US-Houthi conflict on January 11, 2024, across various markets, regions, and industries within the financial sector, emphasizing the role of military strength in shaping global financial responses. An event study methodology is applied to a sample of 3,239 financial sector companies, observing market reactions over multiple event windows: a 15-day pre-event phase and a 15-day post-event phase surrounding the conflict announcement. Cross-sectional analysis is conducted to assess how military strength impacts financial market reactions. The results indicate significant market vulnerability to the US-Houthi conflict, particularly during the period from the event day on January 11, 2024, to the post-event phase, with developed markets experiencing the greatest impact. While American markets showed mixed responses, European, Middle Eastern, and African markets faced notable negative effects due to disrupted trade routes; Asian markets also showed negative reactions, though to a lesser extent. The banking industry recorded the most adverse reaction within the financial sector, and military strength emerged as a critical factor influencing investor behavior in response to the conflict. These findings highlight the need for policymakers to enhance financial market stability by considering military strength and trade route security in risk mitigation strategies, particularly in times of geopolitical uncertainty, such as the period surrounding the US-Houthi conflict in early 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2024-0052
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Red Sea Conflict and Market Reactions: Examining the Role of Military Strength in Financial Markets

William Ginn, İbrahim Halil Ekşi̇, Mosab I. Tabash, Rizky Yudaruddin et al.
6 citations
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
Market Dynamics and Volatility
18.79
article

The Red Sea Conflict and Market Reactions: Examining the Role of Military Strength in Financial Markets

William Ginn, İbrahim Halil Ekşi̇, Mosab I. Tabash, Rizky Yudaruddin, Dadang Lesmana
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines market reactions to the US-Houthi conflict on January 11, 2024, across various markets, regions, and industries within the financial sector, emphasizing the role of military strength in shaping global financial responses. An event study methodology is applied to a sample of 3,239 financial sector companies, observing market reactions over multiple event windows: a 15-day pre-event phase and a 15-day post-event phase surrounding the conflict announcement. Cross-sectional analysis is conducted to assess how military strength impacts financial market reactions. The results indicate significant market vulnerability to the US-Houthi conflict, particularly during the period from the event day on January 11, 2024, to the post-event phase, with developed markets experiencing the greatest impact. While American markets showed mixed responses, European, Middle Eastern, and African markets faced notable negative effects due to disrupted trade routes; Asian markets also showed negative reactions, though to a lesser extent. The banking industry recorded the most adverse reaction within the financial sector, and military strength emerged as a critical factor influencing investor behavior in response to the conflict. These findings highlight the need for policymakers to enhance financial market stability by considering military strength and trade route security in risk mitigation strategies, particularly in times of geopolitical uncertainty, such as the period surrounding the US-Houthi conflict in early 2024.

Peace Economics Peace Science and Public PolicyVol. 31(2)
Coburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), Al Ain University (AE), Mulawarman University (ID), Gaziantep University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.