Factors Affecting Implant Salvage in Patients with Complications After Post-Mastectomy Implant-Based Reconstruction

<b>Background</b>: Implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is the most common method of breast reconstruction, but complications lead to patient distress and delays in cancer treatment. Management of implant complications is varied with no defined guidelines. The inability to salvage IBR is associated with infection, but the impact of antibiotics remains controversial. We aimed to analyze factors affecting salvage rates of threatened IBR requiring operative intervention. The primary outcomes were the rates of unplanned re-operation for threatened IBR for wound closure, exchange, or explant. We hypothesized antibiotic administration would improve salvage rates. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy with IBR from 2012 to 2023 was performed. Threatened IBR was defined as implant exposure, infection, skin necrosis, hematoma, seroma, or wound dehiscence without implant exposure. Management options for patients with implant infection included implant removal and antibiotic treatment, antibiotic treatment alone, implant replacement, washout and implant replacement, or implant removal without a salvage attempt. <b>Results</b>: In total, 6901 patients underwent post-mastectomy IBR, and 184 (2.7%) patients had an unplanned re-operation. A total of 166/184 patients (90.2%) underwent explantation, and 18/184 (9.8%) patients had implant salvage. Between the explant and salvage groups, there were no differences in patient demographics, oncologic treatments, or operative characteristics. The explant group had a higher rate of infection (77.7% vs. 22.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). There was no difference in culture positivity or antibiotic administration history. <b>Conclusions</b>: Implant salvage is feasible but limited by infection. Antibiotic administration does not improve salvage rates. Patient factors, oncologic treatment factors, or operative factors do not impact the ability to salvage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082682
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Affecting Implant Salvage in Patients with Complications After Post-Mastectomy Implant-Based Reconstruction

Michael Chu, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Kyuseok Im, Siu-Yuan Huang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
article

Factors Affecting Implant Salvage in Patients with Complications After Post-Mastectomy Implant-Based Reconstruction

Michael Chu, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Kyuseok Im, Siu-Yuan Huang, Angel F. Bai, Anna M. Leung, Antoine L. Carre, Yilan Jiangliu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is the most common method of breast reconstruction, but complications lead to patient distress and delays in cancer treatment. Management of implant complications is varied with no defined guidelines. The inability to salvage IBR is associated with infection, but the impact of antibiotics remains controversial. We aimed to analyze factors affecting salvage rates of threatened IBR requiring operative intervention. The primary outcomes were the rates of unplanned re-operation for threatened IBR for wound closure, exchange, or explant. We hypothesized antibiotic administration would improve salvage rates. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy with IBR from 2012 to 2023 was performed. Threatened IBR was defined as implant exposure, infection, skin necrosis, hematoma, seroma, or wound dehiscence without implant exposure. Management options for patients with implant infection included implant removal and antibiotic treatment, antibiotic treatment alone, implant replacement, washout and implant replacement, or implant removal without a salvage attempt. <b>Results</b>: In total, 6901 patients underwent post-mastectomy IBR, and 184 (2.7%) patients had an unplanned re-operation. A total of 166/184 patients (90.2%) underwent explantation, and 18/184 (9.8%) patients had implant salvage. Between the explant and salvage groups, there were no differences in patient demographics, oncologic treatments, or operative characteristics. The explant group had a higher rate of infection (77.7% vs. 22.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). There was no difference in culture positivity or antibiotic administration history. <b>Conclusions</b>: Implant salvage is feasible but limited by infection. Antibiotic administration does not improve salvage rates. Patient factors, oncologic treatment factors, or operative factors do not impact the ability to salvage.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
Kaiser Permanente (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), City of Hope (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.