Rehabilitation with and Without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in Stroke Patients: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness, Acceptability, Usability, and Economic-Organisational Sustainabilit

<b>Background</b>: Rehabilitation after stroke often employs Robots and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs). However, evidence of their effectiveness remains inconclusive due to study heterogeneity and limited sample sizes. <b>Methods</b>: This is a protocol of a pragmatic multicentre, multimodal, randomised, controlled, parallel-group (1:1) interventional study with blinded assessors aimed at assessing the effectiveness and sustainability of RADT-mediated rehabilitation compared to traditional rehabilitation. The trial will recruit 596 adult subacute post-stroke patients. Participants will be randomised into either the experimental group (using RADTs and two therapists supervising four to six patients) or the control group (individual traditional rehabilitation). Patients in both groups will undergo a comprehensive rehabilitation treatment, targeting (a) upper limb sensorimotor abilities; (b) lower limb sensorimotor abilities and gait; (c) balance; and (d) cognitive abilities. Patients will undergo 25 sessions, each lasting 45 min, with a frequency of 5 (inpatients) or 3 (outpatients) times a week. The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority of RADTs in the recovery of the activities of daily living (ADL) using the modified Barthel Index. If non-inferiority is established, the study will evaluate the superiority. Secondary endpoints will analyse the improvements in the aforementioned domains, as well as changes in neural plasticity and biochemical aspects. Upper limb dexterity and gait recovery rates during treatment will be monitored. The study will also evaluate ADL and quality of life during a six-month follow-up period. Acceptability and usability of integrated RADTs-based rehabilitation for patients, families, and healthcare providers, along with economic and organisational sustainability for patients, payers, and society, will also be assessed. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study aims to establish stronger evidence on the effectiveness of RADTs in post-stroke patients. <b>Trial registration number:</b> NCT06547827.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082692
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rehabilitation with and Without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in Stroke Patients: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness, Acceptability, Usability, and Economic-Organisational Sustainabilit

Mariacristina Siotto, Alberto Malovini, Nevio Dubbini, Silvana Quaglini et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
4.10
article

Rehabilitation with and Without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in Stroke Patients: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness, Acceptability, Usability, and Economic-Organisational Sustainabilit

Mariacristina Siotto, Alberto Malovini, Nevio Dubbini, Silvana Quaglini, Leopoldo Trieste, Arianna Pavan, Marco Germanotta, Irene Aprile, Carlo Trompetto, Giovanna Nicora, Pietro Fiore, Giuseppina Sgandurra, Giovanni Comandé, Letizia Oreni, Alessio Fasano, Roberto De Icco, Giuseppe Turchetti, Enea Parimbelli, Christian Lunetta, Maria Cristina Mauro, Cristina Messa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Rehabilitation after stroke often employs Robots and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs). However, evidence of their effectiveness remains inconclusive due to study heterogeneity and limited sample sizes. <b>Methods</b>: This is a protocol of a pragmatic multicentre, multimodal, randomised, controlled, parallel-group (1:1) interventional study with blinded assessors aimed at assessing the effectiveness and sustainability of RADT-mediated rehabilitation compared to traditional rehabilitation. The trial will recruit 596 adult subacute post-stroke patients. Participants will be randomised into either the experimental group (using RADTs and two therapists supervising four to six patients) or the control group (individual traditional rehabilitation). Patients in both groups will undergo a comprehensive rehabilitation treatment, targeting (a) upper limb sensorimotor abilities; (b) lower limb sensorimotor abilities and gait; (c) balance; and (d) cognitive abilities. Patients will undergo 25 sessions, each lasting 45 min, with a frequency of 5 (inpatients) or 3 (outpatients) times a week. The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority of RADTs in the recovery of the activities of daily living (ADL) using the modified Barthel Index. If non-inferiority is established, the study will evaluate the superiority. Secondary endpoints will analyse the improvements in the aforementioned domains, as well as changes in neural plasticity and biochemical aspects. Upper limb dexterity and gait recovery rates during treatment will be monitored. The study will also evaluate ADL and quality of life during a six-month follow-up period. Acceptability and usability of integrated RADTs-based rehabilitation for patients, families, and healthcare providers, along with economic and organisational sustainability for patients, payers, and society, will also be assessed. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study aims to establish stronger evidence on the effectiveness of RADTs in post-stroke patients. <b>Trial registration number:</b> NCT06547827.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
University of Foggia (IT), University of Pisa (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT), Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (IT), Fondazione Stella Maris (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), International Flame Research Foundation (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.