A new prediction model of triple-negative breast cancer based on ultrasound radiomics

Background: This study aims to assess the diagnostic potential of a radiomics model based on ultrasonic imaging and characteristics for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: We retrospectively assessed the data of 127 patients with breast tumors, dividing them into training (n = 88) and testing (n = 39) sets. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed, and we compared three distinct prediction models. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) served as the metrics for evaluating the predictive capacity of these models for TNBC. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified margin (odds ratio (OR) 0.296; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.127–0.692; p = 0.005) and posterior echo (OR 0.323; 95% CI 0.112–0.930; p = 0.036) as independent TNBC predictors. We selected thirteen key image features to construct an ultrasonic imaging radiomics model. In the ultrasonic imaging radiomics model, the AUC values for logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) were 0.78, 0.80, 0.84 and 0.95 for the training set, and 0.68, 0.55, 0.71 and 0.65 for the testing set, respectively. In the ultrasonic feature model, the AUC values for LR, SVM, DT and RF were 0.73, 0.54, 0.73 and 0.73 for the training set, and 0.58, 0.82, 0.59 and 0.60 for the testing set, respectively. In the comprehensive model, which combines ultrasonic feature and radiomics feature models, the AUC values for LR, SVM, DT and RF were 0.85, 0.92, 0.78 and 0.92 for the training set, and 0.64, 0.69, 0.63 and 0.76 for the testing set, respectively. Conclusions: Compared with ultrasonic feature and radiomics feature models, the comprehensive model demonstrated better diagnostic performance and could identify TNBC more effectively.

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22514/ejgo.2025.052
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new prediction model of triple-negative breast cancer based on ultrasound radiomics

European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

A new prediction model of triple-negative breast cancer based on ultrasound radiomics

article en

Abstract

Background: This study aims to assess the diagnostic potential of a radiomics model based on ultrasonic imaging and characteristics for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: We retrospectively assessed the data of 127 patients with breast tumors, dividing them into training (n = 88) and testing (n = 39) sets. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed, and we compared three distinct prediction models. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) served as the metrics for evaluating the predictive capacity of these models for TNBC. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified margin (odds ratio (OR) 0.296; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.127–0.692; p = 0.005) and posterior echo (OR 0.323; 95% CI 0.112–0.930; p = 0.036) as independent TNBC predictors. We selected thirteen key image features to construct an ultrasonic imaging radiomics model. In the ultrasonic imaging radiomics model, the AUC values for logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) were 0.78, 0.80, 0.84 and 0.95 for the training set, and 0.68, 0.55, 0.71 and 0.65 for the testing set, respectively. In the ultrasonic feature model, the AUC values for LR, SVM, DT and RF were 0.73, 0.54, 0.73 and 0.73 for the training set, and 0.58, 0.82, 0.59 and 0.60 for the testing set, respectively. In the comprehensive model, which combines ultrasonic feature and radiomics feature models, the AUC values for LR, SVM, DT and RF were 0.85, 0.92, 0.78 and 0.92 for the training set, and 0.64, 0.69, 0.63 and 0.76 for the testing set, respectively. Conclusions: Compared with ultrasonic feature and radiomics feature models, the comprehensive model demonstrated better diagnostic performance and could identify TNBC more effectively.

European Journal of Gynaecological OncologyVol. 46(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A new prediction model of triple-negative breast cancer based on ultrasound radiomics · European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS