From Growth to Governance: Bringing Coproductionist Critique to Degrowth

Scholarship in degrowth has primarily criticised the twinning of technoscientific and environmental policy as underwritten by an ecomodernist agenda that relies on both technological fixes and economic growth paradigms. Moving beyond such critique, we suggest that current policy discourses on the digital and environmental transition also reveal (shifting) imperatives of governance that grant society and the state a key role in the achievement of desirable futures. By focusing calls for reform on how the ecomodernist agenda is repeating capitalist frames of economic growth and technoscientific solutionism, degrowth critique misses equally important shifts in how governance is imagined in relation to science and technology, which increasingly rely on social fixes for the effects of technological innovation on the environment. In this article, we examine the European Commission’s call for ‘twin’ environmental and digital transitions as part of a Green Deal, asking how a coproductionist lens might enrich and strengthen critiques of technology and innovation in degrowth literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technology and Society
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326837
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Growth to Governance: Bringing Coproductionist Critique to Degrowth

Nina Frahm, Tess Doezema
1 citations
Science Technology and Society
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.45
article

From Growth to Governance: Bringing Coproductionist Critique to Degrowth

Nina Frahm, Tess Doezema
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scholarship in degrowth has primarily criticised the twinning of technoscientific and environmental policy as underwritten by an ecomodernist agenda that relies on both technological fixes and economic growth paradigms. Moving beyond such critique, we suggest that current policy discourses on the digital and environmental transition also reveal (shifting) imperatives of governance that grant society and the state a key role in the achievement of desirable futures. By focusing calls for reform on how the ecomodernist agenda is repeating capitalist frames of economic growth and technoscientific solutionism, degrowth critique misses equally important shifts in how governance is imagined in relation to science and technology, which increasingly rely on social fixes for the effects of technological innovation on the environment. In this article, we examine the European Commission’s call for ‘twin’ environmental and digital transitions as part of a Green Deal, asking how a coproductionist lens might enrich and strengthen critiques of technology and innovation in degrowth literature.

Science Technology and SocietyVol. 30(2)
Aarhus University (DK), Galicia Sur Biomedical Foundation (ES), Central Denmark Region (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.