Firms’ venture capital affiliation, platforms’ “skin in the game” and the success of equity crowdfunding campaigns

Abstract In equity crowdfunding, it is still unclear whether unsophisticated inexperienced crowd investors use firms’ quality signals, even strong ones like firms’ affiliation with professional investors (VCs), in their investment decisions. Signals revealing the platform’s private information on issuers’ quality may be more informative to boundedly rational crowd investors than firms’ signals. Our findings based on 550 equity crowdfunding offerings in the U.S. show that the positive effect of affiliation with VCs on the success of equity crowdfunding campaigns is mediated by platforms’ choice of equity compensation (i.e., their “skin in the game”) but only very partially. We interpret these findings as an (admittedly indirect) indication that crowd investors’ cognitive restrictions may be less severe than one might expect based on their limited financial literacy and investment experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-025-00350-7
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firms’ venture capital affiliation, platforms’ “skin in the game” and the success of equity crowdfunding campaigns

Kourosh Shafi, Massimo G. Colombo
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Firms’ venture capital affiliation, platforms’ “skin in the game” and the success of equity crowdfunding campaigns

Kourosh Shafi, Massimo G. Colombo
article en

Abstract

Abstract In equity crowdfunding, it is still unclear whether unsophisticated inexperienced crowd investors use firms’ quality signals, even strong ones like firms’ affiliation with professional investors (VCs), in their investment decisions. Signals revealing the platform’s private information on issuers’ quality may be more informative to boundedly rational crowd investors than firms’ signals. Our findings based on 550 equity crowdfunding offerings in the U.S. show that the positive effect of affiliation with VCs on the success of equity crowdfunding campaigns is mediated by platforms’ choice of equity compensation (i.e., their “skin in the game”) but only very partially. We interpret these findings as an (admittedly indirect) indication that crowd investors’ cognitive restrictions may be less severe than one might expect based on their limited financial literacy and investment experience.

Journal of Industrial and Business EconomicsVol. 53(1)
California State University, East Bay (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Politecnico di Milano, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Research Infrastructures
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.