Rorschach Assessment of Holocaust Trauma

Abstract: In discussing Holocaust trauma, Jean Améry famously asserted: “Whoever was tortured, stays tortured.” Empirical studies comparing Holocaust survivors with control groups have also found evidence of irreversible psychological and neurobiological damage decades after the traumatic events took place. The finding that a proportion of survivors have demonstrated resiliency and experienced psychological growth despite their continued vulnerability has also garnered attention. This article explores the relevance of both themes, enduring vulnerability and resiliency, by examining in depth the Rorschach responses of three female survivors contacted in their community who experienced a similar sequence of atrocities half a century prior to the assessment. In the context of some self-reported information about their life before, during, and after the war, the article outlines both shared characteristics and distinctive features in their Rorschach protocols. The case studies illustrate how the method allows clinicians to observe the trauma manifestations and resiliency features in action, revealing patterns of strengths and vulnerabilities that are unique for each individual. Other issues discussed in the article include patterns of constriction and affective dysregulation, depictions of danger and helplessness scenarios, scoring issues regarding trauma-related thought-disordered responses, and specific Holocaust-related imagery. While mostly adopting a qualitative, experiential approach to the discussion of Rorschach findings, quantitative data are also presented and briefly discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rorschach Assessment of Holocaust Trauma

David Ephraim, Tammy Saltzman, Daniela Schmeichler
1 citations
Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
Psychological Testing and Assessment
1.54
article

Rorschach Assessment of Holocaust Trauma

David Ephraim, Tammy Saltzman, Daniela Schmeichler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: In discussing Holocaust trauma, Jean Améry famously asserted: “Whoever was tortured, stays tortured.” Empirical studies comparing Holocaust survivors with control groups have also found evidence of irreversible psychological and neurobiological damage decades after the traumatic events took place. The finding that a proportion of survivors have demonstrated resiliency and experienced psychological growth despite their continued vulnerability has also garnered attention. This article explores the relevance of both themes, enduring vulnerability and resiliency, by examining in depth the Rorschach responses of three female survivors contacted in their community who experienced a similar sequence of atrocities half a century prior to the assessment. In the context of some self-reported information about their life before, during, and after the war, the article outlines both shared characteristics and distinctive features in their Rorschach protocols. The case studies illustrate how the method allows clinicians to observe the trauma manifestations and resiliency features in action, revealing patterns of strengths and vulnerabilities that are unique for each individual. Other issues discussed in the article include patterns of constriction and affective dysregulation, depictions of danger and helplessness scenarios, scoring issues regarding trauma-related thought-disordered responses, and specific Holocaust-related imagery. While mostly adopting a qualitative, experiential approach to the discussion of Rorschach findings, quantitative data are also presented and briefly discussed.

Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the RorschachVol. 47(1)
Universidad Central de Venezuela (VE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.