Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping Using Isolation Forest and Extended Isolation Forest Algorithms

Unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms have gained significant attention in the field of mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) due to their ability to reveal hidden mineralization zones by effectively modeling complex, nonlinear relationships between exploration data and mineral deposits. This study utilizes two tree-based anomaly detection algorithms, namely, isolation forest (IF) and extended isolation forest (EIF), to enhance MPM and exploration targeting. According to the conceptual model of porphyry copper deposits, several evidence layers were generated, including fault density, multi-element geochemical signatures, proximity to various alteration types (phyllic, argillic, propylitic, and iron oxide), and proximity to intrusive rocks. These layers were integrated using IF and EIF algorithms, and their results were subsequently compared with a geological map of the study area. The comparison revealed a high degree of overlap between the identified anomalous zones and geological features, such as andesitic rocks, tuffs, rhyolites, pyroclastics, and intrusions. Additionally, quantitative assessments through prediction-area plots validated the efficacy of both models in generating prospective targets. The results highlight the significant influence of hyperparameter tuning on the accuracy of prospectivity models. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that hyperparameter tuning is more intuitive and straightforward in IF, as it provides a clear and distinct tuning pattern, whereas EIF lacks such clarity, complicating the optimization process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040411
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping Using Isolation Forest and Extended Isolation Forest Algorithms

Ardeshir Hezarkhani, Ареф Ширази, Adel Shirazy, Seyyed Ataollah Agha Seyyed Mirzabozorg et al.
8 citations
Minerals
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
19.85
article

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping Using Isolation Forest and Extended Isolation Forest Algorithms

Ardeshir Hezarkhani, Ареф Ширази, Adel Shirazy, Seyyed Ataollah Agha Seyyed Mirzabozorg, M. Saremi, Ramin DehghanNiri
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms have gained significant attention in the field of mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) due to their ability to reveal hidden mineralization zones by effectively modeling complex, nonlinear relationships between exploration data and mineral deposits. This study utilizes two tree-based anomaly detection algorithms, namely, isolation forest (IF) and extended isolation forest (EIF), to enhance MPM and exploration targeting. According to the conceptual model of porphyry copper deposits, several evidence layers were generated, including fault density, multi-element geochemical signatures, proximity to various alteration types (phyllic, argillic, propylitic, and iron oxide), and proximity to intrusive rocks. These layers were integrated using IF and EIF algorithms, and their results were subsequently compared with a geological map of the study area. The comparison revealed a high degree of overlap between the identified anomalous zones and geological features, such as andesitic rocks, tuffs, rhyolites, pyroclastics, and intrusions. Additionally, quantitative assessments through prediction-area plots validated the efficacy of both models in generating prospective targets. The results highlight the significant influence of hyperparameter tuning on the accuracy of prospectivity models. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that hyperparameter tuning is more intuitive and straightforward in IF, as it provides a clear and distinct tuning pattern, whereas EIF lacks such clarity, complicating the optimization process.

MineralsVol. 15(4)
Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), University of Tehran (IR)
Amirkabir University of Technology, University of Tehran
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
19.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.