Encounter the unforeseen: Resilient supply chain modeling for a sustainable bioeconomy

Abstract Bioeconomic supply chains (BioSC) processing biogenic resources and substituting fossil‐based products are prone to weather‐induced feedstock supply disruptions, which likely increase in severity and frequency due to climate change. To attain supply security of biobased products that contribute to sustainable development, BioSCs should be equipped with a certain level of “resilience” against unexpected feedstock fluctuations. Existing BioSC models usually capture producer resilience to maximize profitability for anticipated feedstock scenarios. Consumer supply security for unanticipated events has drawn less attention. To encounter the unforeseen and both producer and consumer perspectives, we present a two‐step approach: (1) resilient planning of a European BioSC producing bioethanol as petrol substitute from straw for both producer and consumer perspective; a novel step (2) assesses the “actual” resilience for unanticipated, random feedstock scenarios and economic, and environmental implications. While a producer‐resilient supply chain has lower bioethanol production capacity and already high straw storage capacities to maximize profitability under feedstock fluctuations, supply security degrades. In contrast, consumer‐resilient supply chains have higher production and storage capacities to maintain supply security. Although this network redundancy comes with higher environmental impacts from facility construction and supply chain operation (production and transport), the environmental benefit of substituting petrol exceeds those burdens in most environmental life cycle assessment categories. Consequently, consumer resilience can be congruent with environmental sustainability and should be supported by policymakers to strengthen European bioeconomy and guide producers toward consumer‐resilient supply chains. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encounter the unforeseen: Resilient supply chain modeling for a sustainable bioeconomy

Martin Bruckler, Sílvia Maria Sartor, Lars Wietschel, Andrea Thorenz et al.
1 citations
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
article

Encounter the unforeseen: Resilient supply chain modeling for a sustainable bioeconomy

Martin Bruckler, Sílvia Maria Sartor, Lars Wietschel, Andrea Thorenz, Axel Tuma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Bioeconomic supply chains (BioSC) processing biogenic resources and substituting fossil‐based products are prone to weather‐induced feedstock supply disruptions, which likely increase in severity and frequency due to climate change. To attain supply security of biobased products that contribute to sustainable development, BioSCs should be equipped with a certain level of “resilience” against unexpected feedstock fluctuations. Existing BioSC models usually capture producer resilience to maximize profitability for anticipated feedstock scenarios. Consumer supply security for unanticipated events has drawn less attention. To encounter the unforeseen and both producer and consumer perspectives, we present a two‐step approach: (1) resilient planning of a European BioSC producing bioethanol as petrol substitute from straw for both producer and consumer perspective; a novel step (2) assesses the “actual” resilience for unanticipated, random feedstock scenarios and economic, and environmental implications. While a producer‐resilient supply chain has lower bioethanol production capacity and already high straw storage capacities to maximize profitability under feedstock fluctuations, supply security degrades. In contrast, consumer‐resilient supply chains have higher production and storage capacities to maintain supply security. Although this network redundancy comes with higher environmental impacts from facility construction and supply chain operation (production and transport), the environmental benefit of substituting petrol exceeds those burdens in most environmental life cycle assessment categories. Consequently, consumer resilience can be congruent with environmental sustainability and should be supported by policymakers to strengthen European bioeconomy and guide producers toward consumer‐resilient supply chains. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges .

Journal of Industrial EcologyVol. 29(3)
University of Augsburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.