Validity of patient stratification models based on prognostic burn index

More than 30% of patients with skin burns have inhalation injury (InI). InI worsens clinical status and increases the risk of death. Not all prognostic burn indexes include InI or do not adequately assess severity. Validity of patient stratification models based on prognostic indices was not studied in samples simultaneously consisting of patients with and without InI. Objective. To assess validity of patient stratification models based on prognostic burn indexes in relation to mixed patient samples. Material and methods. The study included 399 patients with skin burns. Of these, there were 140 (35%) ones with InI. There were 283 (71%) men. Age of patients was 50 (36; 66) years, total burn area — 25% (15; 40) of body surface area (BSA), superficial burn area — 20% (10; 30) of BSA, deep burn area — 8% (3; 20) of BSA. RFI (Revised Frank Index), FI (Frank Index), Baux, ABSI scores for predicting the outcome of burn injury were calculated for all patients. They were stratified into groups depending on scores and cause of injury. Mortality in patients with and without InI analyzed using pairwise selection. Validity of indices was assessed by the number of deaths among patients with and without InI in each stratification group. Results. The risk of mortality is 2.2 times higher in patients with burns and InI compared to patients without InI (OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.1—4.5, p=0.036). When comparing mortality among patients with burns and burns with InI in RFI-adjusted groups, we found no differences. This indicated validity of RFI-based model for stratifying patients with different etiological factors. When assessing stratification models based on other indices, it turned out that the groups of patients with burns and burns with InI were significantly different in the number of deaths: FI — in the group of 31—60 points, Baux — 81—100 and ≥101 points, ABSI — 10—11 and ≥12 points. Conclusion. The risk of mortality is 2.2 times higher in patients with burns and InI compared to patients without InI. The RFI-based model is valid for stratifying burn injury patients by probability of death.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202502134
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of patient stratification models based on prognostic burn index

E.I. Eliseenkova, A. V. Sachkov, Т. Г. Спиридонова, M. L. Rogal et al.
Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

Validity of patient stratification models based on prognostic burn index

E.I. Eliseenkova, A. V. Sachkov, Т. Г. Спиридонова, M. L. Rogal, A. O. Medvedev, I. G. Borisov, С. С. Петриков, Е. А. Жиркова
article en

Abstract

More than 30% of patients with skin burns have inhalation injury (InI). InI worsens clinical status and increases the risk of death. Not all prognostic burn indexes include InI or do not adequately assess severity. Validity of patient stratification models based on prognostic indices was not studied in samples simultaneously consisting of patients with and without InI. Objective. To assess validity of patient stratification models based on prognostic burn indexes in relation to mixed patient samples. Material and methods. The study included 399 patients with skin burns. Of these, there were 140 (35%) ones with InI. There were 283 (71%) men. Age of patients was 50 (36; 66) years, total burn area — 25% (15; 40) of body surface area (BSA), superficial burn area — 20% (10; 30) of BSA, deep burn area — 8% (3; 20) of BSA. RFI (Revised Frank Index), FI (Frank Index), Baux, ABSI scores for predicting the outcome of burn injury were calculated for all patients. They were stratified into groups depending on scores and cause of injury. Mortality in patients with and without InI analyzed using pairwise selection. Validity of indices was assessed by the number of deaths among patients with and without InI in each stratification group. Results. The risk of mortality is 2.2 times higher in patients with burns and InI compared to patients without InI (OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.1—4.5, p=0.036). When comparing mortality among patients with burns and burns with InI in RFI-adjusted groups, we found no differences. This indicated validity of RFI-based model for stratifying patients with different etiological factors. When assessing stratification models based on other indices, it turned out that the groups of patients with burns and burns with InI were significantly different in the number of deaths: FI — in the group of 31—60 points, Baux — 81—100 and ≥101 points, ABSI — 10—11 and ≥12 points. Conclusion. The risk of mortality is 2.2 times higher in patients with burns and InI compared to patients without InI. The RFI-based model is valid for stratifying burn injury patients by probability of death.

Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology(2)
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry (RU), Research Institute of Emergency Care (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.