Aerodynamics, technology or pit strategy: why did overtaking in Formula 1 decline during the 1980s and 1990s? A micro-level analysis

Abstract Overtaking in Formula 1 was far more abundant during the 1980s than during the 2000s, but it is poorly understood what exactly caused this decline. This paper uses a negative-binomial model on overtaking data at the driver level from 1983 to 2010 to disentangle the effect of quantifiable factors, such as the number of cars and pit strategies, from the non-quantifiable overtake-friendliness of the tracks and the cars. It was found that overtaking was easiest at the beginning of the study period (1984 and 1985) and then declined until the late-1990s. While most of this decline was gradual, some abrupt downturns were discovered. These downturns seem to coincide with fuel-limit restrictions in the 1980s and the re-introduction of in-race refueling in 1994. The decline in overtaking during the 1990s may be attributed to the increased role of aerodynamics and technology, but their impact was more gradual and therefore harder to establish.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2022-0018
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerodynamics, technology or pit strategy: why did overtaking in Formula 1 decline during the 1980s and 1990s? A micro-level analysis

Jesper de Groote
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Aerodynamics, technology or pit strategy: why did overtaking in Formula 1 decline during the 1980s and 1990s? A micro-level analysis

Jesper de Groote
article en

Abstract

Abstract Overtaking in Formula 1 was far more abundant during the 1980s than during the 2000s, but it is poorly understood what exactly caused this decline. This paper uses a negative-binomial model on overtaking data at the driver level from 1983 to 2010 to disentangle the effect of quantifiable factors, such as the number of cars and pit strategies, from the non-quantifiable overtake-friendliness of the tracks and the cars. It was found that overtaking was easiest at the beginning of the study period (1984 and 1985) and then declined until the late-1990s. While most of this decline was gradual, some abrupt downturns were discovered. These downturns seem to coincide with fuel-limit restrictions in the 1980s and the re-introduction of in-race refueling in 1994. The decline in overtaking during the 1990s may be attributed to the increased role of aerodynamics and technology, but their impact was more gradual and therefore harder to establish.

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in SportsVol. 21(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aerodynamics, technology or pit strategy: why did overtaking in Formula 1 decline during the 1980s and 1990s? A micro-level analysis — Jesper de Groote · Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS