Adam Smith, Publick Works, and Nuclear Policy

Since the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons entered into force in 1970, the peaceful uses of nuclear technology in electricity generation and medicine have been incorporated into international markets. However, nuclear markets are imperfect. This paper focuses on the properties of the nuclear industry that lead to “market failure”, where markets do not necessarily result in socially efficient outcomes. These properties in the production or consumption of a good or service are (1) public goods, such as advances in science; (2) positive or negative externalities, such as nuclear weapons technology proliferation; (3) asymmetric information and uncertainty, where an insurer or financier cannot determine whether the client is acting with due care and due diligence; and (4) increasing returns to scale, such that a “natural” monopoly could be established. Because of these properties, the nuclear industry is a quintessential “publick institution” providing “publick works”, as identified by Adam Smith in 1776. Furthermore, exploding demand for non-fossil generated electricity and declining access to medical radioisotopes requires a review of the public-private boundaries in international nuclear markets while continuing to uphold nonproliferation standards. For these standards to be effective, every nation and firm must adhere to nonproliferation agreements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Beijing Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2025.162031
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adam Smith, Publick Works, and Nuclear Policy

Geoffrey Rothwell, Thomas W. Wood
Beijing Law Review
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Adam Smith, Publick Works, and Nuclear Policy

Geoffrey Rothwell, Thomas W. Wood
article en

Abstract

Since the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons entered into force in 1970, the peaceful uses of nuclear technology in electricity generation and medicine have been incorporated into international markets. However, nuclear markets are imperfect. This paper focuses on the properties of the nuclear industry that lead to “market failure”, where markets do not necessarily result in socially efficient outcomes. These properties in the production or consumption of a good or service are (1) public goods, such as advances in science; (2) positive or negative externalities, such as nuclear weapons technology proliferation; (3) asymmetric information and uncertainty, where an insurer or financier cannot determine whether the client is acting with due care and due diligence; and (4) increasing returns to scale, such that a “natural” monopoly could be established. Because of these properties, the nuclear industry is a quintessential “publick institution” providing “publick works”, as identified by Adam Smith in 1776. Furthermore, exploding demand for non-fossil generated electricity and declining access to medical radioisotopes requires a review of the public-private boundaries in international nuclear markets while continuing to uphold nonproliferation standards. For these standards to be effective, every nation and firm must adhere to nonproliferation agreements.

Beijing Law ReviewVol. 16(02)
Savannah River National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adam Smith, Publick Works, and Nuclear Policy — Geoffrey Rothwell, Thomas W. Wood · Beijing Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS