Advancing molecular macrobenthos biodiversity monitoring: a comparison between Oxford Nanopore and Illumina based metabarcoding and metagenomics

DNA-based methods and developments of sequencing technologies are integral to macrobenthos biodiversity studies, and their implementation as standardized monitoring methods is approaching. Evaluating the efficacy and reliability of these technological developments is crucial for macrobenthos biodiversity assessments. In this study, we compared three DNA-based techniques for assessing the diversity of bulk macrobenthos samples from the Belgian North Sea. Specifically, we compared amplicon sequencing using Illumina MiSeq and portable real-time sequencing of Oxford Nanopore <i>versus</i> shotgun sequencing using Illumina NovaSeq sequencing. The 313 bp mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding fragment served as the target region for the metabarcoding analysis. Our results indicate that Oxford Nanopore and MiSeq metabarcoding had similar performances in terms of alpha and beta diversity, revealing highly similar location-specific community compositions. The NovaSeq metagenomics method also resulted in similar alpha diversity, but slightly different community compositions compared to the metabarcoding approach. Despite these differences, location-specific community compositions were maintained across all platforms. Notably, read counts from the NovaSeq metagenomic analysis showed the weakest correlation to size corrected morphological abundance and there were mismatches between morphological identification and all DNA based findings which are likely caused by a combination of factors such as primer efficiency and an incomplete reference database. Our findings underscore the critical importance of database completeness prior to implementing DNA-based techniques as standardized monitoring method, especially for metagenomics. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that Oxford Nanopore metabarcoding proves to be a viable alternative to the conventional Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding platform for macrobenthos biodiversity monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19158
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing molecular macrobenthos biodiversity monitoring: a comparison between Oxford Nanopore and Illumina based metabarcoding and metagenomics

Karlijn Doorenspleet, Sofie Derycke, Reindert Nijland, Kevin K. Beentjes et al.
5 citations
PeerJ
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
8.58
article

Advancing molecular macrobenthos biodiversity monitoring: a comparison between Oxford Nanopore and Illumina based metabarcoding and metagenomics

Karlijn Doorenspleet, Sofie Derycke, Reindert Nijland, Kevin K. Beentjes, Albertinka J. Murk, Berry B. van der Hoorn, Amalia A. Mailli, Henning Reiss, Annelies De Backer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

DNA-based methods and developments of sequencing technologies are integral to macrobenthos biodiversity studies, and their implementation as standardized monitoring methods is approaching. Evaluating the efficacy and reliability of these technological developments is crucial for macrobenthos biodiversity assessments. In this study, we compared three DNA-based techniques for assessing the diversity of bulk macrobenthos samples from the Belgian North Sea. Specifically, we compared amplicon sequencing using Illumina MiSeq and portable real-time sequencing of Oxford Nanopore <i>versus</i> shotgun sequencing using Illumina NovaSeq sequencing. The 313 bp mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding fragment served as the target region for the metabarcoding analysis. Our results indicate that Oxford Nanopore and MiSeq metabarcoding had similar performances in terms of alpha and beta diversity, revealing highly similar location-specific community compositions. The NovaSeq metagenomics method also resulted in similar alpha diversity, but slightly different community compositions compared to the metabarcoding approach. Despite these differences, location-specific community compositions were maintained across all platforms. Notably, read counts from the NovaSeq metagenomic analysis showed the weakest correlation to size corrected morphological abundance and there were mismatches between morphological identification and all DNA based findings which are likely caused by a combination of factors such as primer efficiency and an incomplete reference database. Our findings underscore the critical importance of database completeness prior to implementing DNA-based techniques as standardized monitoring method, especially for metagenomics. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that Oxford Nanopore metabarcoding proves to be a viable alternative to the conventional Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding platform for macrobenthos biodiversity monitoring.

PeerJVol. 13
Flanders Marine Institute (BE), Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL), Nord University (NO), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Nord universitet, Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen, Instituut voor Landbouw-, Visserij- en Voedingsonderzoek, Vlaamse Overheid
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.