Research on Simplified Design of Model Predictive Control

PID controllers have been dominant in the field of process control for a long time, but their control quality is not ideal and the difficulty of parameter tuning has always been a problem. MPCs have good control quality and robustness, but due to the complexity of the algorithm, most are limited to software on PC machines. Although there are examples of implementations on hardware, they are restricted to specific scenarios and are of an experimental nature. The barriers to application and maintenance are high, and therefore, it has not become as popular as PID. The common self-balancing industrial objects are approximated as a first order plus dead time (FOPDT) model, and various parameters are simplified to obtain the control law of the simplified MPC controller. The control law has a small amount of calculation, good control quality, simple parameter settings, and is suitable for embedding in the field controller. Coupled with the auxiliary identification method, field technicians can easily use it. MATLAB (2016a) comparative simulation experiments show that the simplified MPC controller has obvious control advantages over PID. The results of field engineering applications also show that the simplified MPC controller can feasibly replace the PID algorithm in industrialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actuators
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/act14040191
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Simplified Design of Model Predictive Control

Lizhi Xiao, Qi Wang, Qing Zhang, Shiyun Dong et al.
2 citations
Actuators
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
2.43
article

Research on Simplified Design of Model Predictive Control

Lizhi Xiao, Qi Wang, Qing Zhang, Shiyun Dong, Chi Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

PID controllers have been dominant in the field of process control for a long time, but their control quality is not ideal and the difficulty of parameter tuning has always been a problem. MPCs have good control quality and robustness, but due to the complexity of the algorithm, most are limited to software on PC machines. Although there are examples of implementations on hardware, they are restricted to specific scenarios and are of an experimental nature. The barriers to application and maintenance are high, and therefore, it has not become as popular as PID. The common self-balancing industrial objects are approximated as a first order plus dead time (FOPDT) model, and various parameters are simplified to obtain the control law of the simplified MPC controller. The control law has a small amount of calculation, good control quality, simple parameter settings, and is suitable for embedding in the field controller. Coupled with the auxiliary identification method, field technicians can easily use it. MATLAB (2016a) comparative simulation experiments show that the simplified MPC controller has obvious control advantages over PID. The results of field engineering applications also show that the simplified MPC controller can feasibly replace the PID algorithm in industrialization.

ActuatorsVol. 14(4)
Shanxi University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.