Reassessing World Bank conditionality: beyond count measures
Abstract Many studies argue that the World Bank grants favorable loan conditions to allies of its powerful principals. These studies typically use the count of conditions as a proxy for how demanding loans are on borrowers, even though some conditions are more difficult to comply with than others. We propose a new operationalization: a measure of conditionality stringency in Bank loans constructed using Latent Semantic Scaling. Using this new measure, we find little evidence of a generalizable influence of powerful principals. Instead, the stringency of loan conditions is associated with bureaucratic assessments of risk. To facilitate future research, we provide a new dataset of World Bank loan condition texts and our measure of text stringency for all loans in the dataset.
Authors
- Teresa Kramarz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-3224)
- Ben Cormier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-5308)
- Mark S. Manger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-5866)
- Jacob Winter
Institutions
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- University of Toronto (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Political Science Research and Methods
- Published
- 2025-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2025.19
- Primary Topic
- International Development and Aid
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00