Handoffs in Emergency Departments: A Mixed-Methods Study on Physician Perspectives, Preferences, and Strategies

Background/Objectives: Among the factors contributing to medical errors and misdiagnosis, patient handoffs play a significant role. The negative impact of handoffs includes miscommunications, omissions, and information loss. Patient handoffs are inherent to emergency department (ED) patient care and are recognized as high-risk events. The aim of this study was to use a mixed-methods approach, incorporating a retrospective chart review and qualitative analysis, to understand emergency physicians’ perceptions of handoffs, including their impact on patient safety, patient flow, and patient satisfaction, as well as the strategies employed to manage handoffs and their perceived efficacy. Methods: A seven-question online survey was distributed to 120 attending ED physicians employed across a large academic health system comprising six hospitals. Additionally, a 3-year retrospective chart review provided insights into avoidable handoffs in the ED. Results: The survey responses showed that 69% of physicians believed that handoffs reduced patient safety, 55% felt that they reduced patient satisfaction, and 66% perceived them as contributing to longer patient stays. Additionally, 86% of physicians preferred to hand off no more than two patients, while 79% preferred to receive no more than two. Thematic content analysis identified key factors influencing physician preferences, including ownership, patient safety, patient flow, cooperation and colleagueship, and the challenges of continuing workups. To minimize handoffs, ED physicians primarily reported strategies such as staying late after shifts, restricting patient signups, and planning patient disposition toward the end of their shifts. Lastly, retrospective data analysis suggested that implementing one-hour overlapping shifts and restricting patient signups could reduce ED handoffs by 30%. Conclusions: ED physicians perceive handoffs as affecting patient safety, patient satisfaction, and patient flow negatively and prefer fewer handoffs. Overlapping shifts and selective patient signup strategies may reduce handoffs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Care and Medicine
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ecm2020019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handoffs in Emergency Departments: A Mixed-Methods Study on Physician Perspectives, Preferences, and Strategies

Kevin Taaffe, William L. Jackson, Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, Ronald G. Pirrallo et al.
1 citations
Emergency Care and Medicine
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
2.25
article

Handoffs in Emergency Departments: A Mixed-Methods Study on Physician Perspectives, Preferences, and Strategies

Kevin Taaffe, William L. Jackson, Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, Ronald G. Pirrallo, Sudeep Hegde, Jess Hobbs, Michael Ramsay, Steven Foster
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Among the factors contributing to medical errors and misdiagnosis, patient handoffs play a significant role. The negative impact of handoffs includes miscommunications, omissions, and information loss. Patient handoffs are inherent to emergency department (ED) patient care and are recognized as high-risk events. The aim of this study was to use a mixed-methods approach, incorporating a retrospective chart review and qualitative analysis, to understand emergency physicians’ perceptions of handoffs, including their impact on patient safety, patient flow, and patient satisfaction, as well as the strategies employed to manage handoffs and their perceived efficacy. Methods: A seven-question online survey was distributed to 120 attending ED physicians employed across a large academic health system comprising six hospitals. Additionally, a 3-year retrospective chart review provided insights into avoidable handoffs in the ED. Results: The survey responses showed that 69% of physicians believed that handoffs reduced patient safety, 55% felt that they reduced patient satisfaction, and 66% perceived them as contributing to longer patient stays. Additionally, 86% of physicians preferred to hand off no more than two patients, while 79% preferred to receive no more than two. Thematic content analysis identified key factors influencing physician preferences, including ownership, patient safety, patient flow, cooperation and colleagueship, and the challenges of continuing workups. To minimize handoffs, ED physicians primarily reported strategies such as staying late after shifts, restricting patient signups, and planning patient disposition toward the end of their shifts. Lastly, retrospective data analysis suggested that implementing one-hour overlapping shifts and restricting patient signups could reduce ED handoffs by 30%. Conclusions: ED physicians perceive handoffs as affecting patient safety, patient satisfaction, and patient flow negatively and prefer fewer handoffs. Overlapping shifts and selective patient signup strategies may reduce handoffs.

Emergency Care and MedicineVol. 2(2)
University of Central Florida (US), Prisma Health (US), Clemson University (US)
Clemson University
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.