Efficacy of Early Targeted Antibiotic Therapy in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock

Background and objectiveSepsis and septic shock carry a high mortality rate, necessitating prompt treatment. As antibiotic-resistant pathogens become more prevalent, genotyping offers a potential advantage by quickly identifying organisms and their resistance genes. This study evaluated whether genotyping-targeted antibiotic therapy improved outcomes over conventional bacterial culture-based treatment in patients with sepsis or septic shock, with a focus on correlating Sirtuin1 levels with the inflammatory response and mortality risk.MethodsThis prospective, single-center, open labeled, randomized clinical trial involved 52 patients with sepsis or septic shock randomly assigned to either conventional bacterial culture or genotyping targeted antibiotics. Blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 5 to measure sepsis markers; C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), total leukocyte count (TLC), and Sirtuin 1 and changes in SOFA scores were assessed.ResultsThe intervention did not differ significantly from conventional culture-based therapy in terms of the percentage change of SOFA scores (p=0.679) or ventilator-free days (p=0.362). Similarly, changes in TLC (p=0.522), PCT (p=0.067), and Sirtuin 1 (p=0.227) showed no statistically significant differences, although CRP was the only marker with a significant percentage change (p=0.042). Mortality rates, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality also did not differ significantly (p=0.668, p=0.594, and p=1.00, respectively).ConclusionThe current research discovered that incorporating genotyping in patients with sepsis and septic shock did not result in differences in the prognosis and mortality of these patients. Additionally, the level of Sirtuin 1 did not reflect either improvement or mortality in this specific group of individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/jampr.2025.366679.1090
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Early Targeted Antibiotic Therapy in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock

Mohamed Afify, Rehab H. Werida, Noha Bassiouny, Iman M. Momtaz
Journal of Advanced Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Efficacy of Early Targeted Antibiotic Therapy in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock

Mohamed Afify, Rehab H. Werida, Noha Bassiouny, Iman M. Momtaz
article en

Abstract

Background and objectiveSepsis and septic shock carry a high mortality rate, necessitating prompt treatment. As antibiotic-resistant pathogens become more prevalent, genotyping offers a potential advantage by quickly identifying organisms and their resistance genes. This study evaluated whether genotyping-targeted antibiotic therapy improved outcomes over conventional bacterial culture-based treatment in patients with sepsis or septic shock, with a focus on correlating Sirtuin1 levels with the inflammatory response and mortality risk.MethodsThis prospective, single-center, open labeled, randomized clinical trial involved 52 patients with sepsis or septic shock randomly assigned to either conventional bacterial culture or genotyping targeted antibiotics. Blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 5 to measure sepsis markers; C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), total leukocyte count (TLC), and Sirtuin 1 and changes in SOFA scores were assessed.ResultsThe intervention did not differ significantly from conventional culture-based therapy in terms of the percentage change of SOFA scores (p=0.679) or ventilator-free days (p=0.362). Similarly, changes in TLC (p=0.522), PCT (p=0.067), and Sirtuin 1 (p=0.227) showed no statistically significant differences, although CRP was the only marker with a significant percentage change (p=0.042). Mortality rates, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality also did not differ significantly (p=0.668, p=0.594, and p=1.00, respectively).ConclusionThe current research discovered that incorporating genotyping in patients with sepsis and septic shock did not result in differences in the prognosis and mortality of these patients. Additionally, the level of Sirtuin 1 did not reflect either improvement or mortality in this specific group of individuals.

Journal of Advanced Medical and Pharmaceutical ResearchVol. 0(0)
Cairo University (EG), Damanhour University (EG)
Tanta University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.