Combustion and Emissions Optimization of Diesel–Methanol Dual-Fuel Engine: Emphasis on Valve Phasing and Injection Parameters

Diesel–methanol dual-fuel (DMDF) mode holds significant potential for achieving highly efficient and clean combustion in modern marine engines. However, issues such as low methanol substitution rate and high pollutant emissions persist, and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. This study numerically investigated the combustion and emissions of a heavy-duty marine engine operating in DMDF mode. Multi-cycle simulations, incorporating diesel and methanol dual-fuel chemical mechanisms, were carried out to explore engine performance across various key parameters, including valve phasing, injection pressure, injection phasing, and nozzle diameter. The results indicate that valve phasing can greatly affect the indicated thermal efficiency, particularly at large valve overlap angles. This is primarily attributed to the variations of methanol film mass and thereby overall combustion efficiency. The optimized valve phasing increases the indicated thermal efficiency by 2.4%. By optimizing injection parameters, the formation of methanol film is effectively reduced, facilitating the improvement in the indicated thermal efficiency. The optimal injection pressure and nozzle diameter are 20 bar and 0.3 mm, respectively, resulting in increases in indicated thermal efficiency of 1.28% and 1.07%, compared to the values before optimization. Advancing injection timing and increasing nozzle diameter markedly decrease methanol film mass because some methanol remains undisturbed by the intake flow, while large droplet sizes tend to enhance the resistance to airflow. As injection pressure rises from 20 bar to 50 bar, the spray–wall interaction region expands, droplet size diminishes, and methanol film formation increases. Consequently, the combustible methanol in the cylinder is reduced, undermining the indicated thermal efficiency. Additionally, there exists a trade-off relationship between NOx and soot emissions, and the high heat release rate results in increased NOx but decreased soot emissions for diesel–methanol dual-fuel engines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041183
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combustion and Emissions Optimization of Diesel–Methanol Dual-Fuel Engine: Emphasis on Valve Phasing and Injection Parameters

Zifan Lian, Lijiang Wei, Zhenyu Sun, Jiaying Pan et al.
3 citations
Processes
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
2.16
article

Combustion and Emissions Optimization of Diesel–Methanol Dual-Fuel Engine: Emphasis on Valve Phasing and Injection Parameters

Zifan Lian, Lijiang Wei, Zhenyu Sun, Jiaying Pan, Jie Ma, Chunying Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Diesel–methanol dual-fuel (DMDF) mode holds significant potential for achieving highly efficient and clean combustion in modern marine engines. However, issues such as low methanol substitution rate and high pollutant emissions persist, and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. This study numerically investigated the combustion and emissions of a heavy-duty marine engine operating in DMDF mode. Multi-cycle simulations, incorporating diesel and methanol dual-fuel chemical mechanisms, were carried out to explore engine performance across various key parameters, including valve phasing, injection pressure, injection phasing, and nozzle diameter. The results indicate that valve phasing can greatly affect the indicated thermal efficiency, particularly at large valve overlap angles. This is primarily attributed to the variations of methanol film mass and thereby overall combustion efficiency. The optimized valve phasing increases the indicated thermal efficiency by 2.4%. By optimizing injection parameters, the formation of methanol film is effectively reduced, facilitating the improvement in the indicated thermal efficiency. The optimal injection pressure and nozzle diameter are 20 bar and 0.3 mm, respectively, resulting in increases in indicated thermal efficiency of 1.28% and 1.07%, compared to the values before optimization. Advancing injection timing and increasing nozzle diameter markedly decrease methanol film mass because some methanol remains undisturbed by the intake flow, while large droplet sizes tend to enhance the resistance to airflow. As injection pressure rises from 20 bar to 50 bar, the spray–wall interaction region expands, droplet size diminishes, and methanol film formation increases. Consequently, the combustible methanol in the cylinder is reduced, undermining the indicated thermal efficiency. Additionally, there exists a trade-off relationship between NOx and soot emissions, and the high heat release rate results in increased NOx but decreased soot emissions for diesel–methanol dual-fuel engines.

ProcessesVol. 13(4)
Tianjin University (CN), Weichai Power (China) (CN), State Key Laboratory of Engine and Powertrain System, Weifang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
2.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.