Fraud Detection in Government in the Last Ten Years

Over the past three years, Indonesian government state losses have exhibited a noticeable upward trend. The fraud triangle theory offers valuable insights into the relationship between fraud (as manifested in state losses) and three key factors: pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. These elements are reflected in instances of revenue shortfalls, potential losses, and non-compliance with regulations. Our study analyzed data from various government entities, including the central government, local governments, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), regional-owned enterprises (ROEs), public service agencies, regional public service institutions, and other government-related agencies over the past decade (2013 to 2023). Our findings reveal that pressure stemming from revenue shortfalls, opportunities associated with potential losses, and rationalization arising from non-compliance with regulations significantly contribute to fraudulent activities within the government sector. Based on our research, the fraud triangle theory, with its focus on revenue shortfalls, potential losses, and non-compliance with regulations, provides a robust framework for identifying fraudulent practices within the government sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v10i1.9212
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fraud Detection in Government in the Last Ten Years

Abdul Rohman, Desty Wana, Surya Raharja
Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation
Corruption and Economic Development
article

Fraud Detection in Government in the Last Ten Years

Abdul Rohman, Desty Wana, Surya Raharja
article en

Abstract

Over the past three years, Indonesian government state losses have exhibited a noticeable upward trend. The fraud triangle theory offers valuable insights into the relationship between fraud (as manifested in state losses) and three key factors: pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. These elements are reflected in instances of revenue shortfalls, potential losses, and non-compliance with regulations. Our study analyzed data from various government entities, including the central government, local governments, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), regional-owned enterprises (ROEs), public service agencies, regional public service institutions, and other government-related agencies over the past decade (2013 to 2023). Our findings reveal that pressure stemming from revenue shortfalls, opportunities associated with potential losses, and rationalization arising from non-compliance with regulations significantly contribute to fraudulent activities within the government sector. Based on our research, the fraud triangle theory, with its focus on revenue shortfalls, potential losses, and non-compliance with regulations, provides a robust framework for identifying fraudulent practices within the government sector.

Journal of Applied Accounting and TaxationVol. 10(1)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fraud Detection in Government in the Last Ten Years — Abdul Rohman, Desty Wana, et al. · Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS