The Australian private school ascendancy: origins, development and future

Abstract Australia’s large private school sector receives high levels of public funding, has a high and increasing share of enrolments and advantaged students, and a decreasing share of disadvantaged students. Employing an historical sociology approach and drawing on primary and secondary sources, I argue that this ascendency arose from the inherent differences between public and private schooling, combined with the historical circumstances as schooling developed from early colonial times. Inherent differences include public schooling’s responsibilities to the whole community and the private sector’s freedoms and responsibilities only to its chosen clienteles and its politically powerful auspicing organisations. I clarify what private school ascendency means, build on my own and others’ arguments about residualisation, and explain my use of the terms positional goods and sector blind. Particularly, I show that sector blind policies fail to account for the role of the private sector’s freedoms and the public sector’s responsibilities regarding the teaching labour market and numerical and qualitative enrolments. I conclude with some brief suggestions about what can be done.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00833-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Australian private school ascendancy: origins, development and future

Barbara Preston
2 citations
The Australian Educational Researcher
Education Systems and Policy
17.85
article

The Australian private school ascendancy: origins, development and future

Barbara Preston
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Australia’s large private school sector receives high levels of public funding, has a high and increasing share of enrolments and advantaged students, and a decreasing share of disadvantaged students. Employing an historical sociology approach and drawing on primary and secondary sources, I argue that this ascendency arose from the inherent differences between public and private schooling, combined with the historical circumstances as schooling developed from early colonial times. Inherent differences include public schooling’s responsibilities to the whole community and the private sector’s freedoms and responsibilities only to its chosen clienteles and its politically powerful auspicing organisations. I clarify what private school ascendency means, build on my own and others’ arguments about residualisation, and explain my use of the terms positional goods and sector blind. Particularly, I show that sector blind policies fail to account for the role of the private sector’s freedoms and the public sector’s responsibilities regarding the teaching labour market and numerical and qualitative enrolments. I conclude with some brief suggestions about what can be done.

The Australian Educational ResearcherVol. 52(4)
IP Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education Systems and Policy
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Australian private school ascendancy: origins, development and future — Barbara Preston · The Australian Educational Researcher (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS