Metallic Bipolar Plate Production Through Additive Manufacturing: Contrasting MEX/M and PBF-LB/M Approaches

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have witnessed remarkable advancements, offering opportunities to produce complex components across various industries. This paper explores the potential of AM for fabricating bipolar plates (BPPs) in fuel cell or electrolysis cell applications. BPPs play a critical role in the performance and efficiency of such cells, and conventional manufacturing methods often face limitations, particularly concerning the complexity and customization of geometries. The focus here lies in two specific AM methods: the laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) and material extrusion of metals (MEX/M). PBF-LB/M, tailored for high-performance applications, enables the creation of highly complex geometries, albeit at increased costs. On the other hand, MEX/M excels in rapid prototyping, facilitating the swift production of diverse geometries for real-world testing. This approach can facilitate the evaluation of geometries suitable for mass production via sinter-based manufacturing processes. The geometric deviations of different BPPs were identified by evaluating 3D scans. The PBF-LB/M method is more suitable for small features, while the MEX/M method has lower deviations for geometrically less complex BPPs. Through this investigation, the limits of the capabilities of these AM methods became clear, knowledge that can potentially enhance the design and production of BPPs, revolutionizing the energy conversion and storage landscape and contributing to the design of additive manufacturing technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Analyses
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jeta3020012
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metallic Bipolar Plate Production Through Additive Manufacturing: Contrasting MEX/M and PBF-LB/M Approaches

Karim Asami, Claus Emmelmann, Tim Röver, S. Roth et al.
4 links
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Analyses
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Metallic Bipolar Plate Production Through Additive Manufacturing: Contrasting MEX/M and PBF-LB/M Approaches

Karim Asami, Claus Emmelmann, Tim Röver, S. Roth, Jan Hünting
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have witnessed remarkable advancements, offering opportunities to produce complex components across various industries. This paper explores the potential of AM for fabricating bipolar plates (BPPs) in fuel cell or electrolysis cell applications. BPPs play a critical role in the performance and efficiency of such cells, and conventional manufacturing methods often face limitations, particularly concerning the complexity and customization of geometries. The focus here lies in two specific AM methods: the laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) and material extrusion of metals (MEX/M). PBF-LB/M, tailored for high-performance applications, enables the creation of highly complex geometries, albeit at increased costs. On the other hand, MEX/M excels in rapid prototyping, facilitating the swift production of diverse geometries for real-world testing. This approach can facilitate the evaluation of geometries suitable for mass production via sinter-based manufacturing processes. The geometric deviations of different BPPs were identified by evaluating 3D scans. The PBF-LB/M method is more suitable for small features, while the MEX/M method has lower deviations for geometrically less complex BPPs. Through this investigation, the limits of the capabilities of these AM methods became clear, knowledge that can potentially enhance the design and production of BPPs, revolutionizing the energy conversion and storage landscape and contributing to the design of additive manufacturing technologies.

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical AnalysesVol. 3(2)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.