Determining the Predictive Value of Shock Index, Reverse Shock Index, and Modified Shock Index in Hospital Outcome of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Elderly Patients

Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of the shock index (SI), reverse shock index (RSI), and modified shock index (MSI) in determining the hospital outcomes of elderly patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Design: A cross-sectional study. Settings: The study was carried out in Tabriz, East Azarbaijan, North-west Iran. Participants: The study included patients aged over 75 years who were presented with acute upper GIB. Outcome Measures: Specificity, sensitivity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated to assess the predictive capacity of these three indices in predicting mortality risk among patients as their in-hospital outcome. Results: Age distribution among the patients in this study did not follow a normal pattern. Regarding the predictive value of the SI, RSI, and MSI for patient outcomes, the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were as follows: SI with 48.48% sensitivity and 86.84% specificity (95% CI: 79.23-92.44), RSI with 33.33% sensitivity and 92.04% specificity (95% CI: 85.42-96.29), and MSI with 30.30% sensitivity and 91.23% specificity (95% CI: 84.46-95.71). Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated that none of these criteria effectively predicted mortality in patients with GIB. However, SI, RSI, and MSI exhibited high specificity in predicting hospital outcomes for GIB patients, making them valuable tools for ruling out life-threatening conditions. However, due to their low sensitivity, they are less reliable for diagnostic purposes in determining the specific causes of GIB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Aging
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ija.2024.e25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining the Predictive Value of Shock Index, Reverse Shock Index, and Modified Shock Index in Hospital Outcome of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Elderly Patients

Aisan Akhgari, Hamidreza Mortezabagi, Amir Ghaffarzad, Zahra Parsian et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Aging
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
0.46
article

Determining the Predictive Value of Shock Index, Reverse Shock Index, and Modified Shock Index in Hospital Outcome of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Elderly Patients

Aisan Akhgari, Hamidreza Mortezabagi, Amir Ghaffarzad, Zahra Parsian, Zahra Vand Rajabpour, Seyed Pouya Paknezhad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of the shock index (SI), reverse shock index (RSI), and modified shock index (MSI) in determining the hospital outcomes of elderly patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Design: A cross-sectional study. Settings: The study was carried out in Tabriz, East Azarbaijan, North-west Iran. Participants: The study included patients aged over 75 years who were presented with acute upper GIB. Outcome Measures: Specificity, sensitivity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated to assess the predictive capacity of these three indices in predicting mortality risk among patients as their in-hospital outcome. Results: Age distribution among the patients in this study did not follow a normal pattern. Regarding the predictive value of the SI, RSI, and MSI for patient outcomes, the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were as follows: SI with 48.48% sensitivity and 86.84% specificity (95% CI: 79.23-92.44), RSI with 33.33% sensitivity and 92.04% specificity (95% CI: 85.42-96.29), and MSI with 30.30% sensitivity and 91.23% specificity (95% CI: 84.46-95.71). Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated that none of these criteria effectively predicted mortality in patients with GIB. However, SI, RSI, and MSI exhibited high specificity in predicting hospital outcomes for GIB patients, making them valuable tools for ruling out life-threatening conditions. However, due to their low sensitivity, they are less reliable for diagnostic purposes in determining the specific causes of GIB.

International Journal of AgingVol. 2
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, University of Tabriz
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.