Coseismic Rupture and Postseismic Afterslip of the 2020 Nima Mw 6.4 Earthquake

On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.4 earthquake occurred in Nima County in the Qiangtang Terrane of the central Tibetan Plateau. This event, caused by normal faulting, remains controversial in terms of its rupture process and causative fault due to the complex tectonics of the region. In this study, we analyzed the coseismic and postseismic deformation using differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (D-InSAR). The coseismic slip distribution was independently estimated through InSAR inversion and teleseismic waveform analysis, while the afterslip distribution was inferred from postseismic deformation. Coulomb stress failure analysis was conducted to assess the potential seismic hazard. Our results showed a maximum line-of-sight (LOS) coseismic deformation of about 29 cm away from the satellite, with quasi-vertical subsidence peaking at 35 cm. Four distinct deformation zones were observed in the quasi-east–west direction. Coseismic deformation and slip models based on InSAR and teleseismic data indicate that the Nima earthquake ruptured the West Yibu Chaka fault. The seismogenic fault had a strike of 26°, an eastward dip of 43°, and a rake of −87.28°, with rupture patches at depths of 3–13 km and a maximum slip of 1.1 m. Postseismic deformation showed cumulative LOS displacement of up to 0.05 m. Afterslip was concentrated in the up-dip and down-dip areas of the coseismic rupture zone, reaching a maximum of 0.11 m. Afterslip was also observed along the East Yibu Caka fault. Coulomb stress modeling indicates an increased seismic risk between the Yibu Caka fault and the Jiangai Zangbu fault, highlighting the vulnerability of the region to future seismic activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081389
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coseismic Rupture and Postseismic Afterslip of the 2020 Nima Mw 6.4 Earthquake

Ling Bai, Chaoya Liu, Shaojun Wang
Remote Sensing
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Coseismic Rupture and Postseismic Afterslip of the 2020 Nima Mw 6.4 Earthquake

Ling Bai, Chaoya Liu, Shaojun Wang
article en

Abstract

On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.4 earthquake occurred in Nima County in the Qiangtang Terrane of the central Tibetan Plateau. This event, caused by normal faulting, remains controversial in terms of its rupture process and causative fault due to the complex tectonics of the region. In this study, we analyzed the coseismic and postseismic deformation using differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (D-InSAR). The coseismic slip distribution was independently estimated through InSAR inversion and teleseismic waveform analysis, while the afterslip distribution was inferred from postseismic deformation. Coulomb stress failure analysis was conducted to assess the potential seismic hazard. Our results showed a maximum line-of-sight (LOS) coseismic deformation of about 29 cm away from the satellite, with quasi-vertical subsidence peaking at 35 cm. Four distinct deformation zones were observed in the quasi-east–west direction. Coseismic deformation and slip models based on InSAR and teleseismic data indicate that the Nima earthquake ruptured the West Yibu Chaka fault. The seismogenic fault had a strike of 26°, an eastward dip of 43°, and a rake of −87.28°, with rupture patches at depths of 3–13 km and a maximum slip of 1.1 m. Postseismic deformation showed cumulative LOS displacement of up to 0.05 m. Afterslip was concentrated in the up-dip and down-dip areas of the coseismic rupture zone, reaching a maximum of 0.11 m. Afterslip was also observed along the East Yibu Caka fault. Coulomb stress modeling indicates an increased seismic risk between the Yibu Caka fault and the Jiangai Zangbu fault, highlighting the vulnerability of the region to future seismic activity.

Remote SensingVol. 17(8)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.