Russian conduit: a new approach in aortic root and ascending aortic surgery. Immediate and mid-term results in a single center

Background. There was a trend towards valve-sparing techniques in aortic root surgery in recent decades. This approach can significantly improve the quality of life and do not require anticoagulation. There is a question on surgical strategy for patients with native aortic leaflets not suitable for reconstruction. We describe an alternative technique of aortic root replacement with certain advantages in mid-term period compared to standard Bio Bentall procedure. Material and methods. The study included 50 patients who underwent surgery for aortic root and ascending aorta lesions between 2014 and 2022. Mean follow-up was 31.0±17.9 months in the group «Russian conduit» and 39.2±22.7 months in the group 2 «BioBentall» (p=0.159). In the 1st group, patients (n=28) underwent a combined Bentall-De Bono procedure and aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium. In the 2nd group (n=22), surgery was performed using synthetic composite conduit containing biological aortic root stented prosthesis. Results. In the 1st group, there were no conversions to standard Bentall or BioBentall procedure. Cumulative freedom from MACE (delayed all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, infective endocarditis) after 12, 24, and 48 months was similar (92.59±5.04% versus 100% (p=0.367), 88.7±6.1% versus 93.3±6.4% (p=0.534) and 88.7±6.1% versus 86.7±8.8% (p=0.864)). Freedom from redo surgeries throughout 48 months was 92.59±5.04% and 92.3±7.4%, respectively (p=0.734). Indexed effective orifice area in mid-term period was significantly larger in the 1st group (1.36±0.23 versus 0.93±0.1 cm2, p<0.01). Conclusion. Aortic root and ascending aortic replacement using Russian conduit technique demonstrates comparable results regarding freedom from redo surgeries compared to standard BioBentall technique and better hemodynamic parameters (mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area) in mid-term period. This approach may be successfully used for aortic root disease if reconstruction of native cusps is not possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Cardiology Bulletin
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/cardiobulletin20252001170
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Russian conduit: a new approach in aortic root and ascending aortic surgery. Immediate and mid-term results in a single center

O.O. Ognev, Roman Nikolaevich Komarov, S. Т. Enginoev, A. N. Dzyundzya et al.
Russian Cardiology Bulletin
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Russian conduit: a new approach in aortic root and ascending aortic surgery. Immediate and mid-term results in a single center

O.O. Ognev, Roman Nikolaevich Komarov, S. Т. Enginoev, A. N. Dzyundzya, E.A. Skridlevskaya, B. M. Tlisov, Ruslan M. Isaev, A.M. Ismailbaev, Nasiba B. Seifatova, Ksenia Kolosova
article en

Abstract

Background. There was a trend towards valve-sparing techniques in aortic root surgery in recent decades. This approach can significantly improve the quality of life and do not require anticoagulation. There is a question on surgical strategy for patients with native aortic leaflets not suitable for reconstruction. We describe an alternative technique of aortic root replacement with certain advantages in mid-term period compared to standard Bio Bentall procedure. Material and methods. The study included 50 patients who underwent surgery for aortic root and ascending aorta lesions between 2014 and 2022. Mean follow-up was 31.0±17.9 months in the group «Russian conduit» and 39.2±22.7 months in the group 2 «BioBentall» (p=0.159). In the 1st group, patients (n=28) underwent a combined Bentall-De Bono procedure and aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium. In the 2nd group (n=22), surgery was performed using synthetic composite conduit containing biological aortic root stented prosthesis. Results. In the 1st group, there were no conversions to standard Bentall or BioBentall procedure. Cumulative freedom from MACE (delayed all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, infective endocarditis) after 12, 24, and 48 months was similar (92.59±5.04% versus 100% (p=0.367), 88.7±6.1% versus 93.3±6.4% (p=0.534) and 88.7±6.1% versus 86.7±8.8% (p=0.864)). Freedom from redo surgeries throughout 48 months was 92.59±5.04% and 92.3±7.4%, respectively (p=0.734). Indexed effective orifice area in mid-term period was significantly larger in the 1st group (1.36±0.23 versus 0.93±0.1 cm2, p<0.01). Conclusion. Aortic root and ascending aortic replacement using Russian conduit technique demonstrates comparable results regarding freedom from redo surgeries compared to standard BioBentall technique and better hemodynamic parameters (mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area) in mid-term period. This approach may be successfully used for aortic root disease if reconstruction of native cusps is not possible.

Russian Cardiology BulletinVol. 20(1)
Sechenov University (RU), Astrakhan State Medical University (RU), Federal State Budgetary Institution "Federal Center For Cardiovascular Surgery" Ministry of Health of The Russian Federation (RU), National Medical Research Center of Cardiology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.