Study of sampling phases for body odor sampling prior to analysis by TD-GC×GC/ToFMS

Body odor consists of a complex matrix of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which has garnered increasing interest in fields like medicine for its potential in disease diagnosis. However, the field of body odor analysis is advancing slowly, partly due to a lack of standardized methodologies. Although gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely used for VOC analysis, there is a broad range of sampling and extraction methods, leading to different or even sometimes contradictory results. To move toward standardized procedures, this study compares five sampling phases for direct body odor sampling in terms of analytical cleanliness and VOC trapping/release efficiency: gauze, glass beads, PowerSorb<sup>®</sup>, Getxent<sup>®</sup> microtubes, and passive sampling pillows (PSP). Thermodesorption was employed to simplify the protocol and minimize contamination or sample loss, which often occurs during multistep processes. Given the matrix's complexity and the need to detect trace-level compounds, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC/ToFMS) was used to achieve high sensitivity and peak capacity. PSP and PowerSorb<sup>®</sup> demonstrated the best performance, with mean recovery yields of 95% and 71%, respectively, and 22% and 10% variability, ensuring good repeatability. These findings, initially obtained under simulated conditions with a synthetic mixture, were validated with real body odor samples, with an optimal sampling duration estimated between 30 min and 1 h. This study not only highlights these effective sampling solutions but also emphasizes the risks associated with using sorbent phases that lack adequate analytical cleanliness (i.e., clean blank) such as gauze.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-05857-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study of sampling phases for body odor sampling prior to analysis by TD-GC×GC/ToFMS

Didier Thiébaut, Elsa Boudard, Nabil Moumane, Jérôme Vial et al.
3 citations
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
2.02
article

Study of sampling phases for body odor sampling prior to analysis by TD-GC×GC/ToFMS

Didier Thiébaut, Elsa Boudard, Nabil Moumane, Jérôme Vial, José Dugay, Lisa Fisson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Body odor consists of a complex matrix of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which has garnered increasing interest in fields like medicine for its potential in disease diagnosis. However, the field of body odor analysis is advancing slowly, partly due to a lack of standardized methodologies. Although gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely used for VOC analysis, there is a broad range of sampling and extraction methods, leading to different or even sometimes contradictory results. To move toward standardized procedures, this study compares five sampling phases for direct body odor sampling in terms of analytical cleanliness and VOC trapping/release efficiency: gauze, glass beads, PowerSorb<sup>®</sup>, Getxent<sup>®</sup> microtubes, and passive sampling pillows (PSP). Thermodesorption was employed to simplify the protocol and minimize contamination or sample loss, which often occurs during multistep processes. Given the matrix's complexity and the need to detect trace-level compounds, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC/ToFMS) was used to achieve high sensitivity and peak capacity. PSP and PowerSorb<sup>®</sup> demonstrated the best performance, with mean recovery yields of 95% and 71%, respectively, and 22% and 10% variability, ensuring good repeatability. These findings, initially obtained under simulated conditions with a synthetic mixture, were validated with real body odor samples, with an optimal sampling duration estimated between 30 min and 1 h. This study not only highlights these effective sampling solutions but also emphasizes the risks associated with using sorbent phases that lack adequate analytical cleanliness (i.e., clean blank) such as gauze.

Analytical and Bioanalytical ChemistryVol. 417(14)
Primary Health Care (QA), ESPCI Paris (FR)
Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie, École Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.