Connecting the Pipes: Navigating the Fragmented Rural Water Governance in the Philippines Through Common‐Pool Resource Design Principles and Social Capital

ABSTRACT Access to water for domestic use remains a challenge in many rural areas of the Philippines. To address this, the government constructs water systems and transfers their operation and maintenance to community‐based organizations (CBOs), but the sustainability of these systems varies widely. The literature attributes this variability to fragmented governance. However, this overlooks the implementation gap at the community level, where CBOs are both managers and end‐users. This study examines how institutional arrangements shaped by Ostrom's Common‐Pool Resource (CPR) principles and social capital influence collective action and rural water governance. Drawing from qualitative data across three CBO‐managed water systems in Janiuay, Iloilo, the findings highlight three key factors to sustainable rural water governance: participatory decision‐making fostering trust and ownership, balancing external support and self‐governance, and cultivating social capital were critical factors in fostering cooperation and successful self‐governance of CBO‐managed rural water systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Politics & Policy
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.70010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Economic Development in India
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting the Pipes: Navigating the Fragmented Rural Water Governance in the Philippines Through Common‐Pool Resource Design Principles and Social Capital

Antonio D. Salazar
2 citations
Asian Politics & Policy
Social and Economic Development in India
8.40
article

Connecting the Pipes: Navigating the Fragmented Rural Water Governance in the Philippines Through Common‐Pool Resource Design Principles and Social Capital

Antonio D. Salazar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Access to water for domestic use remains a challenge in many rural areas of the Philippines. To address this, the government constructs water systems and transfers their operation and maintenance to community‐based organizations (CBOs), but the sustainability of these systems varies widely. The literature attributes this variability to fragmented governance. However, this overlooks the implementation gap at the community level, where CBOs are both managers and end‐users. This study examines how institutional arrangements shaped by Ostrom's Common‐Pool Resource (CPR) principles and social capital influence collective action and rural water governance. Drawing from qualitative data across three CBO‐managed water systems in Janiuay, Iloilo, the findings highlight three key factors to sustainable rural water governance: participatory decision‐making fostering trust and ownership, balancing external support and self‐governance, and cultivating social capital were critical factors in fostering cooperation and successful self‐governance of CBO‐managed rural water systems.

Asian Politics & PolicyVol. 17(2)
University of the Philippines Visayas (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Economic Development in India
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.