Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?

This mixed methods study explores 315 distance learning students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence digital assistants (AIDAs) over an 11-month period in three distinct studies. The research investigates student perspectives on both a publicly available AI digital assistant (p-AIDA), such as ChatGPT, and a potential institutionally developed AI digital assistant (i-AIDA). Findings indicate that students highly valued 24/7 immediate academic feedback and the personalisation of the i-AIDA, and these perspectives remained largely stable across the three studies. However, concerns about academic integrity, data privacy, and ethical implications persisted across the studies. A cluster analysis identified three distinct student groups of highly critical, supportive, and keenly supportive learners, with key differences based on prior GenAI experience, educational background, and age. This study underscores both the potential and challenges of developing institutional AI solutions to enhance student learning while addressing privacy and ethical concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084279
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?

Bart Rienties, Emily Coughlan, Tim Coughlan, Felipe Maciel Tessarolo et al.
4 citations
Applied Sciences
Online Learning and Analytics
6.77
article

Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?

Bart Rienties, Emily Coughlan, Tim Coughlan, Felipe Maciel Tessarolo, John Domingue
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This mixed methods study explores 315 distance learning students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence digital assistants (AIDAs) over an 11-month period in three distinct studies. The research investigates student perspectives on both a publicly available AI digital assistant (p-AIDA), such as ChatGPT, and a potential institutionally developed AI digital assistant (i-AIDA). Findings indicate that students highly valued 24/7 immediate academic feedback and the personalisation of the i-AIDA, and these perspectives remained largely stable across the three studies. However, concerns about academic integrity, data privacy, and ethical implications persisted across the studies. A cluster analysis identified three distinct student groups of highly critical, supportive, and keenly supportive learners, with key differences based on prior GenAI experience, educational background, and age. This study underscores both the potential and challenges of developing institutional AI solutions to enhance student learning while addressing privacy and ethical concerns.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(8)
The Open University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Online Learning and Analytics
6.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs? — Bart Rienties, Emily Coughlan, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS