Comparative Assessment of Tool Wear and Surface Topography After Superfinish Turning of Inconel 718 with Carbide and Ceramic Inserts

Cutting inserts made of ceramic materials are used in rough machining processes of Inconel 718. This article compares sintered carbide S205 inserts with 6160 ceramic inserts after finish turning of Inconel 718 with a hardness of 45 HRC. The evaluation focused on insert wear, surface topography and changes in cutting edge radius. The results show differences in the wear of S205 and 6160 inserts. S205 inserts characterize the formation of buildup on the rake face, while 6160 inserts tend to form buildup on the flank face. Furthermore, ceramic 6160 inserts are more prone to notch wear. Surface topography analysis revealed the formation of individual high peaks on surfaces machined with ceramic inserts. The Sa parameter for all cutting conditions studied did not exceed 0.45 µm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084265
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced machining processes and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Tool Wear and Surface Topography After Superfinish Turning of Inconel 718 with Carbide and Ceramic Inserts

Piotr Szablewski, Stanisław Legutko, Bartłomiej Krawczyk, Krzysztof Smak et al.
3 citations
Applied Sciences
Advanced machining processes and optimization
2.14
article

Comparative Assessment of Tool Wear and Surface Topography After Superfinish Turning of Inconel 718 with Carbide and Ceramic Inserts

Piotr Szablewski, Stanisław Legutko, Bartłomiej Krawczyk, Krzysztof Smak, Nicolae Ungureanu, Jana Petrů
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cutting inserts made of ceramic materials are used in rough machining processes of Inconel 718. This article compares sintered carbide S205 inserts with 6160 ceramic inserts after finish turning of Inconel 718 with a hardness of 45 HRC. The evaluation focused on insert wear, surface topography and changes in cutting edge radius. The results show differences in the wear of S205 and 6160 inserts. S205 inserts characterize the formation of buildup on the rake face, while 6160 inserts tend to form buildup on the flank face. Furthermore, ceramic 6160 inserts are more prone to notch wear. Surface topography analysis revealed the formation of individual high peaks on surfaces machined with ceramic inserts. The Sa parameter for all cutting conditions studied did not exceed 0.45 µm.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(8)
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ), Technical University of Cluj-Napoca (RO), Uniwersytet Kaliski im. Prezydenta Stanisława Wojciechowskiego (PL), Poznań University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced machining processes and optimization
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Assessment of Tool Wear and Surface Topography After Superfinish Turning of Inconel 718 with Carbide and Ceramic Inserts — Piotr Szablewski, Stanisław Legutko, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS