Spectrum of creative agencies in AI-based art: analysis of art reviews

The relation between creativity and AI is an ongoing debate in artmaking. AI challenges the traditional understanding of who (or what) can be the creative agent and whether the outcomes are creative. Such a debate is visible in art reviews of AI-based art, but their analyses are missing from the research on AI and creativity. We analyse 39 AI art evaluations from key global newspapers to answer the following questions: how is creative agency discussed, and how are the evaluations of creative outcomes affected by the understandings of creative agency? Our results demonstrate a spectrum of creative agencies, which expands from four (human-centred, AI-centred, co-agency, assemblage) to seven (AI-assisted, AI-enchanted, and AI-improvised) agencies. Perceived creative agency is connected to the evaluation of artworks: Positive evaluations often consider human creative agency, but negative evaluations blame AI. These findings suggest that new ways to assess creativity are emerging in the AI era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Creativity
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2025.2491471
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectrum of creative agencies in AI-based art: analysis of art reviews

Riina Lundman, Tikli Loivaranta, Johanna Hautala
4 citations
Digital Creativity
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
7.74
article

Spectrum of creative agencies in AI-based art: analysis of art reviews

Riina Lundman, Tikli Loivaranta, Johanna Hautala
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The relation between creativity and AI is an ongoing debate in artmaking. AI challenges the traditional understanding of who (or what) can be the creative agent and whether the outcomes are creative. Such a debate is visible in art reviews of AI-based art, but their analyses are missing from the research on AI and creativity. We analyse 39 AI art evaluations from key global newspapers to answer the following questions: how is creative agency discussed, and how are the evaluations of creative outcomes affected by the understandings of creative agency? Our results demonstrate a spectrum of creative agencies, which expands from four (human-centred, AI-centred, co-agency, assemblage) to seven (AI-assisted, AI-enchanted, and AI-improvised) agencies. Perceived creative agency is connected to the evaluation of artworks: Positive evaluations often consider human creative agency, but negative evaluations blame AI. These findings suggest that new ways to assess creativity are emerging in the AI era.

Digital CreativityVol. 36(3)
University of Turku (FI), Tampere University (FI), University of Vaasa (FI)
Academy of Finland, Koneen Säätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.