The Requirements of Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation and Post-grant Amended Patents

SPCs are linked to a basic patent and presuppose the existence of such a patent. The requirements for the grant of an SPC in Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation depend on the basic patent and its content. However, patents can be amended, even after they have been granted. It is conceivable that a patent amendment could influence the assessment of these requirements and thus the granting or validity of an SPC. This issue is the subject of this contribution. It is approached by first analysing the requirements for the grant of an SPC in Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation, in particular their interpretation by the CJEU, as well as the procedural and substantive requirements for a patent amendment. Based on this, the interaction between these two areas of law is examined, recognising that there are similarities. Different potential scenarios are discussed with the result that the requirements for the grant of an SPC in Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation, in their current interpretation by the CJEU, are suitable to withstand a patent amendment and cannot be circumvented by such an amendment.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53292/fc2b6232.aaf0a3fd
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Requirements of Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation and Post-grant Amended Patents

Anna Hofmann
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

The Requirements of Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation and Post-grant Amended Patents

Anna Hofmann
article en

Abstract

SPCs are linked to a basic patent and presuppose the existence of such a patent. The requirements for the grant of an SPC in Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation depend on the basic patent and its content. However, patents can be amended, even after they have been granted. It is conceivable that a patent amendment could influence the assessment of these requirements and thus the granting or validity of an SPC. This issue is the subject of this contribution. It is approached by first analysing the requirements for the grant of an SPC in Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation, in particular their interpretation by the CJEU, as well as the procedural and substantive requirements for a patent amendment. Based on this, the interaction between these two areas of law is examined, recognising that there are similarities. Different potential scenarios are discussed with the result that the requirements for the grant of an SPC in Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation, in their current interpretation by the CJEU, are suitable to withstand a patent amendment and cannot be circumvented by such an amendment.

(2024 1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Requirements of Art. 3(a) and (c) SPC Regulation and Post-grant Amended Patents — Anna Hofmann · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS