Uncertainty-aware segmentation quality prediction via deep learning Bayesian Modeling: Comprehensive evaluation and interpretation on skin cancer and liver segmentation

Image segmentation is a critical step in computational biomedical image analysis, typically evaluated using metrics like the Dice coefficient during training and validation. However, in clinical settings without manual annotations, assessing segmentation quality becomes challenging, and models lacking reliability indicators face adoption barriers. To address this gap, we propose a novel framework for predicting segmentation quality without requiring ground truth annotations during test time. Our approach introduces two complementary frameworks: one leveraging predicted segmentation and uncertainty maps, and another integrating the original input image, uncertainty maps, and predicted segmentation maps. We present Bayesian adaptations of two benchmark segmentation models-SwinUNet and Feature Pyramid Network with ResNet50-using Monte Carlo Dropout, Ensemble, and Test Time Augmentation to quantify uncertainty. We evaluate four uncertainty estimates-confidence map, entropy, mutual information, and expected pairwise Kullback-Leibler divergence-on 2D skin lesion and 3D liver segmentation datasets, analyzing their correlation with segmentation quality metrics. Our framework achieves an R<sup>2</sup> score of 93.25 and Pearson correlation of 96.58 on the HAM10000 dataset, outperforming previous segmentation quality assessment methods. For 3D liver segmentation, Test Time Augmentation with entropy achieves an R<sup>2</sup> score of 85.03 and a Pearson correlation of 65.02, demonstrating cross-modality robustness. Additionally, we propose an aggregation strategy that combines multiple uncertainty estimates into a single score per image, offering a more robust and comprehensive assessment of segmentation quality compared to evaluating each measure independently. The proposed uncertainty-aware segmentation quality prediction network is interpreted using gradient-based methods such as Grad-CAM and feature embedding analysis through UMAP. These techniques provide insights into the model's behavior and reliability, helping to assess the impact of incorporating uncertainty into the segmentation quality prediction pipeline. The code is available at: https://github.com/sikha2552/Uncertainty-Aware-Segmentation-Quality-Prediction-Bayesian-Modeling-with-Comprehensive-Evaluation-.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2025.102547
Citations
4
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty-aware segmentation quality prediction via deep learning Bayesian Modeling: Comprehensive evaluation and interpretation on skin cancer and liver segmentation

Javier García López, O. K. Sikha, Adrián Galdrán, Júlia Rodríguez‐Comas et al.
4 citations
Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
AI in cancer detection
9.92
article

Uncertainty-aware segmentation quality prediction via deep learning Bayesian Modeling: Comprehensive evaluation and interpretation on skin cancer and liver segmentation

Javier García López, O. K. Sikha, Adrián Galdrán, Júlia Rodríguez‐Comas, Gemma Piella, Meritxell Riera-Marín, Miguel A. González Ballester
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Image segmentation is a critical step in computational biomedical image analysis, typically evaluated using metrics like the Dice coefficient during training and validation. However, in clinical settings without manual annotations, assessing segmentation quality becomes challenging, and models lacking reliability indicators face adoption barriers. To address this gap, we propose a novel framework for predicting segmentation quality without requiring ground truth annotations during test time. Our approach introduces two complementary frameworks: one leveraging predicted segmentation and uncertainty maps, and another integrating the original input image, uncertainty maps, and predicted segmentation maps. We present Bayesian adaptations of two benchmark segmentation models-SwinUNet and Feature Pyramid Network with ResNet50-using Monte Carlo Dropout, Ensemble, and Test Time Augmentation to quantify uncertainty. We evaluate four uncertainty estimates-confidence map, entropy, mutual information, and expected pairwise Kullback-Leibler divergence-on 2D skin lesion and 3D liver segmentation datasets, analyzing their correlation with segmentation quality metrics. Our framework achieves an R<sup>2</sup> score of 93.25 and Pearson correlation of 96.58 on the HAM10000 dataset, outperforming previous segmentation quality assessment methods. For 3D liver segmentation, Test Time Augmentation with entropy achieves an R<sup>2</sup> score of 85.03 and a Pearson correlation of 65.02, demonstrating cross-modality robustness. Additionally, we propose an aggregation strategy that combines multiple uncertainty estimates into a single score per image, offering a more robust and comprehensive assessment of segmentation quality compared to evaluating each measure independently. The proposed uncertainty-aware segmentation quality prediction network is interpreted using gradient-based methods such as Grad-CAM and feature embedding analysis through UMAP. These techniques provide insights into the model's behavior and reliability, helping to assess the impact of incorporating uncertainty into the segmentation quality prediction pipeline. The code is available at: https://github.com/sikha2552/Uncertainty-Aware-Segmentation-Quality-Prediction-Bayesian-Modeling-with-Comprehensive-Evaluation-.

Computerized Medical Imaging and GraphicsVol. 123
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Institute of Scientific and Technical Information (CN)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
AI in cancer detection
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.