Influence of protective layers on the resistance of concrete structures under blast and impact loading

The rising threat of blast and impact events to critical infrastructure has underscored the need for advanced protective solutions to enhance the durability of structural materials.Protective layers can decrease the damage and increase the resistance of structures against such short-term dynamic loading.Different approaches are presented: dispersed fibre reinforcement and endless-fibre textile reinforcement.High-performance concrete with dispersed fibre reinforcement (HPFRC) is recognised for its exceptional strength and resistance to dynamic loading.However, its performance under blast conditions can be further improved with the addition of protective layers.This study investigates how different protective layers and their position affect the damage and structural behaviour of HPFRC subjected to blast loading.One of the protective layers is pliable and made of polyurethane, the other is stiff and made of glass/epoxy.Experiments were conducted using an explosive, placed in direct contact with the panels, to assess damage under different protective configurations.These configurations included uncoated panels, panels with one-sided stiff coatings, two-sided pliable coatings, and panels with stiff layer on one side and pliable layer on the other.On the other hand, textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) with endless carbon fibre reinforcement is used to strengthen existing structures.On the rear side of an impact-subjected structure, the textile-reinforced strengthening layer enables a membrane action and self-centering effect, reduces scabbing, and increases the perforation limit.On the impact-facing side, strengthening layers consisting of a cover layer and a damping layer decrease the impact energy induced into the concrete structure.The findings of all approaches shown in the work demonstrate the potential benefits of adding protective layers, particularly in reducing the scabbing, while also indicating that certain configurations can reduce the likelihood of full perforation.The results also reveal potential disadvantages of applying protective layers, such as increased cracking and reduced residual capacity of concrete structures.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21012/fc12.1145
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of protective layers on the resistance of concrete structures under blast and impact loading

Petr Máca, Lena Leicht, Petr Hála, Radoslav Sovják et al.
1 citations
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.95
article

Influence of protective layers on the resistance of concrete structures under blast and impact loading

Petr Máca, Lena Leicht, Petr Hála, Radoslav Sovják, Přemysl Kheml, Birgit Beckmann, Alžběta Měrková
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rising threat of blast and impact events to critical infrastructure has underscored the need for advanced protective solutions to enhance the durability of structural materials.Protective layers can decrease the damage and increase the resistance of structures against such short-term dynamic loading.Different approaches are presented: dispersed fibre reinforcement and endless-fibre textile reinforcement.High-performance concrete with dispersed fibre reinforcement (HPFRC) is recognised for its exceptional strength and resistance to dynamic loading.However, its performance under blast conditions can be further improved with the addition of protective layers.This study investigates how different protective layers and their position affect the damage and structural behaviour of HPFRC subjected to blast loading.One of the protective layers is pliable and made of polyurethane, the other is stiff and made of glass/epoxy.Experiments were conducted using an explosive, placed in direct contact with the panels, to assess damage under different protective configurations.These configurations included uncoated panels, panels with one-sided stiff coatings, two-sided pliable coatings, and panels with stiff layer on one side and pliable layer on the other.On the other hand, textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) with endless carbon fibre reinforcement is used to strengthen existing structures.On the rear side of an impact-subjected structure, the textile-reinforced strengthening layer enables a membrane action and self-centering effect, reduces scabbing, and increases the perforation limit.On the impact-facing side, strengthening layers consisting of a cover layer and a damping layer decrease the impact energy induced into the concrete structure.The findings of all approaches shown in the work demonstrate the potential benefits of adding protective layers, particularly in reducing the scabbing, while also indicating that certain configurations can reduce the likelihood of full perforation.The results also reveal potential disadvantages of applying protective layers, such as increased cracking and reduced residual capacity of concrete structures.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.